Pages

Thursday 28 April 2016

Sony A6300 Review: Pro-Worthy Mirrorless Camera

Editor's choice

The good

  • Stellar photo quality
  • Razor-sharp 4K movies
  • Extremely quick autofocus
  • Fast, continuous shooting, with good motion tracking
  • Excellent high-res OLED viewfinder
  • Reassuringly solid alloy body
  • External mic jack
  • The bad

  • Confusing menu system
  • So-so, nontouch-screen LCD
  • Steep price, compared to the similar a6000 model
  • Smaller lens selection than for DSLR competitors from Canon and Nikon
  • The Sony a6300 is a mirrorless camera for those who have pro-level ambitions. Building on the success of the Sony a6000, this premium cousin sports the same 24-megapixel resolution, but with a new sensor that offers improved photo quality in low light. Priced at $998 for the body and only $1,148 with a 16-50mm lens, the a6300 also stands out because of its fantastic 4K video, external mic jack and sturdier metal design. However, the a6300 costs nearly twice as much as the a6000. We'll help you decide if the upgrades are worth your investment.

    Design

    The a6300's biggest design improvement is the upgrade from a composite material (reinforced plastic) body to magnesium alloy. That adds 0.63 ounces (for a total of 14.25 ounces), but it's a positive change. Although it's pretty durable, the a6000 always felt fragile; the a6300's heft removes the uneasy feeling that you might break the camera. The rest is essentially the same, for better or worse. The a6300 has slightly smaller (4.7 x 2.6 x 1.9 inches) dimensions, a deep handgrip, popup flash for fill lighting and a hot shoe for a more powerful strobe (or mounting a mic).

    Some little tweaks mean a lot. The OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF), already quite nice, gets a resolution upgrade to 1024 x 768 pixels (XGA) from 800 x 600 pixels (SVGA), as well as an option to bump screen refresh from 60 to 120 frames per second (fps) to keep the preview from blurring when you pan.

    The 3-inch, 640 x 480 rear LCD still provides a view that's inferior to the EVF and, unlike most other mirrorless cameras at this price, it's not a touch screen. Still, your ability to tilt up the LCD 90 degrees and down 45 degrees is great for framing extreme shots, as well as holding the camera steady when you're shooting video. A sensor automatically switches the preview from LCD to EVF when you place the camera to your eye. You can turn off this feature and set one of the camera's programmable buttons to toggle between screens. (We'll get to that in a bit.)

    The addition of an external microphone jack allows the a6300 to use virtually any mic — a great improvement over the a6000, which only lets you plug in a few Sony microphones into its flash hot shoe.

    MORE: Best Mirrorless Cameras From Beginner to Pro

    Controls

    Buttons and menus continue to be a mix of good and bad on the Sony a6300. Good is the freedom to program the C1 and C2 buttons as shortcuts. Plus, nearly every button can be reassigned to trigger nearly any menu option. A new combo button and switch near the right corner of the LCD toggles between autofocus and manual focus and activates auto exposure lock.

    Bad is a sloppy menu layout that has sprawled even more. Pressing the menu button brings up six submenus, with up to nine sub-sub menus under each and up to six settings under each sub-sub menu. It's hard to suss out the logic, like why an item such as LCD display quality level is under the toolbox icon submenu instead of the gear icon submenu.

    Those programmable shortcut buttons sometimes save you from falling into the menu abyss. Also helpful is the Fn button, which brings up an on-screen menu for quick settings like ISO (light sensitivity), and autofocus mode or metering mode. You can adjust settings like aperture and shutter speed using either a wheel on the back right of the camera or a (hard-to-reach) thumbwheel on the top right. Still infuriating is the tiny, recessed video record button below the top wheel, where it's nearly blocked by the camera strap mount.

    The interface has a few little upgrades for pros, like displaying audio levels when capturing video and customizing image file names and embedding copyright info. Gamma Disp. Assist makes it easier to preview a video shot on-screen in the professional S-Log format. If these upgrades sound superfluous or baffling, the a6300 probably isn't worth the splurge for you.

    Image Quality

    Great photos (and videos) make up for the a6300's lackluster interface. This mirrorless camera retains the 24-megapixel resolution of its forerunner. It has an upgraded APS-C CMOS sensor (same size as in most DLSRs) that provides a higher max ISO of 51,200 — up from 12,800 on the a6000. That's one f-stop (illumination level), so it's not as dramatic as it looks, and the images are not pretty at that max setting.

    Lightning-fast autofocus, a hallmark of the a6000, gets even faster on the a6300.

    I shot pictures with the 3X (16-50mm) kit zoom lens, as well as a snazzy 4.4x (16-70mm) Zeiss lens, which retails for about $900. The camera captured simultaneous JPEG and uncompressed RAW images, in order to gauge the in-camera processing — which was quite good. Light metering and focus setting depended on the subject matter, but were mostly Multi (aka evaluative or matrix) metering and Wide AF.

    MORE: Best DSLR Cameras From Beginner to Pro

    Bright-Light Quality

    Like virtually every camera, the a6300 does well on a sunny day. It perfectly captures the skin tones and colorful gear of divers emerging from the Pacific. With the 16-70mm Zeiss lens, the a6300 quickly locked sharp focus on the figure in the foreground at the far left.

    Sony a6300, F11, 1/640 sec, ISO 400, 70mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, F11, 1/640 sec, ISO 400, 70mm. Credit: Sean Captain

    Accurate color is indistinguishable between the a6300 (at left) and a6000 (right)

    Both: F9, ISO 800, 50mm; a6300: 1/200 sec; a6000: 1/250 sec. Credit: Sean CaptainBoth: F9, ISO 800, 50mm; a6300: 1/200 sec; a6000: 1/250 sec. Credit: Sean Captain

    Detail is fine and color is true in this close-up of a cactus.

    Sony a6300, F8, 1/200 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, F8, 1/200 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainIt's just a tad sharper (and a skosh brighter) than an image taken with the a6000.

    Sony a6000, F9, 1/200 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6000, F9, 1/200 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean Captain

    Dynamic Range

    The a6300's fine ability to capture both highlights and shadow is evident in the cactus photos and this other beach photo — ranging from late afternoon sunlight beating on the mom's forehead to her shadowed hair and baby's less-illuminated face. The kit lens captures detail well.

    Sony a6300, F5.6, 1/320 sec., ISO 500, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, F5.6, 1/320 sec., ISO 500, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainI used the camera's default Dynamic Range Optimizer (DRO) setting for this and most other shots. It processes a single photo to bring out highlights and shadows, without combining multiple shots (with frequent blurring) to make an HDR image. Like the a6000, the a6300 has both automatic and manual DRO settings — letting you push the dynamic range to near-HDR levels, as seen in these two photos, first shot in Auto, then level 4 (of 5) DRO.

    Sony a6300, f16, 1/80 sec., ISO 200, 44mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, f16, 1/80 sec., ISO 200, 44mm. Credit: Sean Captain

    MORE: How to Take Great Pictures with the Sony a6300 or a6000

    Low-Light Results

    Color and Detail

    The a6300 and a6000 perform almost identically well in photos of a bar at night at a very high ISO.

    Sony a6300, F5.6, 1/60 sec., ISO 6400, 35mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, F5.6, 1/60 sec., ISO 6400, 35mm. Credit: Sean CaptainWhen you're using auto white balance, some amber tint is to be expected in both the a6300 photo above and the a6000 below.

    Sony a6000, F5, 1/60 sec., ISO 6400, 31mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6000, F5, 1/60 sec., ISO 6400, 31mm. Credit: Sean Captain

    ISO Performance

    The a6300 achieves high light sensitivity of ISO 51,200, which is in line with rival cameras, but the results aren't pretty. In shots of the ocean liner Queen Mary, images looked clean up to ISO 3200, when they were displayed at around 1280 x 800 pixels — about the resolution of a typical laptop screen. Images were acceptable at ISO 6400, and showed just a little fuzziness in very smooth surfaces like the sky. Things fell apart an f-stop higher (ISO 12,800), but these are solid results for a camera with a sensor of this size.

    Sony a6300, F5.6, 1/60 sec., ISO 3200, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, F5.6, 1/60 sec., ISO 3200, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainThe same photo taken with the a6000 at ISO 3200 is a bit more mottled, especially in the sky.

    Sony a6000, F5.6, 1/60 sec., ISO 3200, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6000, F5.6, 1/60 sec., ISO 3200, 50mm. Credit: Sean Captain

    Focus and Speed

    Lightning-fast autofocus, a hallmark of the a6000, gets even faster in the a6300: 0.05 versus 0.06 seconds, according to Sony's specs. Sony attributes the benefit to the whopping 425 phase-detection autofocus sensors on the new 24.2-MP imaging chip, up from 179 in the a6000.

    a6300, F9, 1/400 sec., ISO 160, 70mm. Credit: Sean Captaina6300, F9, 1/400 sec., ISO 160, 70mm. Credit: Sean Captain

    The camera had no difficulty locking focus on the tiny target of a kite high in the sky.

    Same as above. Cropped to show kite detail. Credit: Sean CaptainSame as above. Cropped to show kite detail. Credit: Sean Captain

    Continuous Shooting and AF Tracking

    The a6300 matches its predecessor's max burst rate of 11 fps (refocusing between each shot). I found the midlevel speed of 6 fps to be plenty, and since it fills the memory buffer less, I could shoot longer to capture more action.

    Both cameras have focus tracking that's smart enough to distinguish the correct moving subject about two-thirds of the time. In about half a dozen tests, the a6300 seemed a bit better than the a6000 at catching a target and staying on it, such as this cyclist. You can see the progression in a handful of wide shots, along with 100 percent crops on his face.

    Sony a6300, f5.6, 1/500 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, f5.6, 1/500 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainTo fully appreciate how fast shooting is (even on the Mid setting), check out this GIF made from a 24-photo burst of a skateboarder. For some reason, white balance shifts in two images.

    Sony a6300, f5.6, 1/400 sec., ISO 100, 50mm Credit: Sean CaptainSony a6300, f5.6, 1/400 sec., ISO 100, 50mm Credit: Sean Captain

    Video Quality

    The a6000 is an outstanding HD (up to 1880p, 60 fps) video camera. The a6300 continues that quality, as you can see in this clip of volleyball players.

    It also provides a new 4K/UHD option (up to 30 fps) with video so sharp you could cut yourself on it.

    Nighttime 4K video is equally stunning. The 30-fps limit (typical for 4K/UHD cameras) is an asset, because it allows a slower shutter speed than HD clips I shot at 60 fps.

    The whooshing sound in the second and third clips, triggered by even a slight breeze, shows the limits of the built-in microphones. The option to connect an external mic, such as one with a noise-limiting windsock, is very handy.

    Another fun upgrade is the ability to shoot HD video in HFR (high frame rate) at 120 fps, which provides 4x slow motion when you're playing it back at 30 fps.

    Wireless Sharing

    Sony has made transferring photos over Wi-Fi radically simpler. Instead of making you manually enter the camera's Wi-Fi hotspot password into your phone, Sony took a cue from camera makers like Olympus and now displays a QR code on the a6300's LCD that you can scan with the latest PlayMemories Mobile app to establish a connection. That's less important with NFC Android phones, because you can establish pairing by tapping the camera, but it's a huge improvement on iPhones, which lack this capability.

    Unlike Sony's many competitors, the a6300 does not allow you to control the camera from a smartphone.

    You can also connect the a6300 to Wi-Fi hotspots to share photos across the network. It's also simpler, as Sony has added WPS push, which only requires you to tap a button on the phone, as long as you have a router that supports the technology. Unlike many competitors, the a6300 does not allow you to control the camera from a smartphone.

    Battery Life

    Using the industry-standard CIPA method, Sony rates a6300 battery life at approximately 400 shots if you're using the LCD, and 350 shots if you're using the power-hungry viewfinder. I got 153 shots in one session, 218 in another and 513 in a third. (In the last case, I shot in burst mode, getting lots of photos compared to the downtime when the LCD was on.)

    You can goose battery power in several ways, like dimming the screen and viewfinder, and using the default Standard LCD quality setting, instead of the High option. Setting a short time for the camera to "go to sleep" between shots helps, as well as programing a shortcut button to trigger Deactivate Monitor, so you can turn off the LCD and viewfinder between shots.

    MORE: How to Take Great Photos with a DSLR or Mirrorless Camera

    Even with all the power-saving tricks, you'll feel more relaxed on a daylong shoot with an extra Sony NP-FW50 lithium-ion battery, which sells for about $50.

    Lenses

    The 16-50mm kit lens option adds a mere $150 to the base price, for rather good quality. It held up well to the 16-70mm Zeiss lens; it provided sharp quality at the center of photos, but trailed off to the edges, as you can see in this photo.

    16-50mm kit lens, f9, 1/160 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean Captain16-50mm kit lens, f9, 1/160 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainIn comparison, the SEL1670Z 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS lens that was included with our review unit stayed sharp across the frame. Another benefit of the Zeiss is its wide f4 aperture throughout its zoom range. The kit lens's max aperture varies from f3.5 (wide) to f5.6 (telephoto) — a standard range for kit lenses that is a slight handicap in low light.

    16-70mm Zeiss lens, f9, 1/160 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean Captain16-70mm Zeiss lens, f9, 1/160 sec., ISO 100, 50mm. Credit: Sean CaptainIf $900 is beyond your means, Sony has some other options. A nice low-light alternative for nearby subjects is the Sony SEL35F18, a 35mm prime (nonzooming) lens with a giant f1.8 aperture that sells for roughly $400. For serious telephoto work in bright light (such as bird watching), the E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS image-stabilized zoom is a great deal at about $350. Combine that with the 16-50mm kit lens, and you can cover a tremendous range, from ultrawide to supertelephoto. If you decide that you don't need the a6300's extra goodies, you can get the a6000 and save plent y of money for lens upgrades.

    Bottom Line

    Though you might not be a fan of labeling yourself, it might be a good exercise when you need to decide between the new Sony a6300 and the older and cheaper a6000. If you consider yourself a really "serious" photographer who wants the absolute, best quality, the better low-light performance and slight autofocus improvement may be worth it. The case for the a6300 grows if video is a priority, since you can shoot in 4K and get respectable audio from the external mic jack.

    The a6000 is the better option if you want to spend less but still enjoy great photo quality and speed. Whichever model you choose, you'll have a lot of fun capturing gorgeous images.


    Source: Sony A6300 Review: Pro-Worthy Mirrorless Camera

    Sony A6300 camera with 4K support launched in India at Rs. 74,990

    Sony has launched a new mirrorless camera in India, Sony A6300. The camera is launched in India at Rs. 74,990. It comes with 4K support. A6300 is now available in India.

    Sony A6300Sony A6300 comes with 425 phase detection AF points which Sony claim to be world's higher number of AF points on any interchangeable lens camera. The camera can shoot upto 11 frames per second with continuous autofocus and exposure tracking.

    Sony A6300 Mirrorless camera supports full live-view continuous shooting on the Tru-Finder or LCD screen. The camera is equipped with 24.2 Megapixel APS-C sized Exmor CMOS sensor that works together with a BIONZ X image processing engine which can produced image in ISO sensitivity range ISO 100 – 51200.

    Sony A6300 can shoot and record high resolution 4K video with full pixel readout in the Super 35mm format. It has Fast Hybrid AF system that combines high-speed phase detection AF with extremely accurate contrast AF and allows it to capture and lock on to moving subjects in as little as 0.05 seconds.

    Sony A6300 is equipped with a microphone line input that accepts external microphones and supports XLR input with Sony's XLR adapter kit, as well as Gamma Display Assist, a new function that allows users to monitor images or check focus when recording S-Log movies. It also carries with it enhanced Zebra functionality for greater exposure control and has availability of Picture profile settings, Time Code / User Bit and much more.

    Sony α6300- ILCE-6300L/B IN5 (with SELP1650 lens) price in India is Rs. 74,990. It is available in India.


    Source: Sony A6300 camera with 4K support launched in India at Rs. 74,990

    Wednesday 27 April 2016

    SpiderLight Hand Strap launces on Kickstarter

    Yesterday Spider Holster, the producers of professional camera holsters and strap accessories, launched their new product on Kickstarter, the SpiderLight Hand Strap. The SpiderLight Hand Strap is designed for use with mirrorless and small DSLR camera bodies. These new hand straps offer the convenience of carrying your camera for extended periods of time without the bulk and fatigue of a neck strap. Here's how.

     The SpiderLight Hand Strap brings all of the great features of our pro hand strap to the world of mirrorless and other smaller lightweight cameras.

    Use with permission of Spider Holster

    The folks at Spider Holster know photographers don't want to be fumbling with their gear when shooting in action filled environments. So, the SpiderLight Hand Strap has an S-curve design that allows you to get your hand in and out quickly. This S-curve design also places your hand in the correct position to access all of your camera's controls. With the SpiderLight photographers can quickly release the strap from the camera or leave it on when attaching the camera to a tripod, which is a really nice touch. Many pro level hand straps can be either cumbersome or flimsy. The SpiderLight strikes a great balance. Its slim padded design provides strength and security without the bulk. With this hand strap you don't need to "hold" the camera. You can actually relax your hand and "let go". Of course this feels stra nge at first, but it allows the photographer to keep their camera available without putting it back in their bag.

    Again, the SpiderLight is a professional grade hand strap designed for mirrorless and newer smaller DSLRs. It doesn't work well with pro "point & shoot" cameras like the Panasonic LX100. These camera's controls aren't in the same position as those of interchangeable lens cameras. It would be cool if Spider Holster made a hand strap for those cameras, but the body designs are probably too varied to make it practical. But if you are using one of the new small pro cameras check out the SpiderLight Kickstarter page. There are several pledge support options from a single SpiderLight to kits offering full integration with the Spider Holster's Pro line of strap and holster accessories.


    Source: SpiderLight Hand Strap launces on Kickstarter

    Sony A6300 Field Test: Mirrorless camera offers many improvements and great all-around performance

    by Jeremy Gray

    posted Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 3:21 PM EDT

    The Sony A6000 was a very popular camera indeed; the best-selling interchangeable lens camera over $600 and the best-selling mirrorless camera. The Sony A6300 is a very good follow-up to the A6000, besting its predecessor in basically every way.

    During my field test with the Sony A6300, I found it to be a great mirrorless camera overall. It is compact, but includes many controls. It has an APS-C sensor that delivers really good image quality, even at higher ISOs. Many of its best improvements are subtle in nature, such as the redesigned APS-C CMOS sensor and improved electronic viewfinder. However, some other improvements are immediately noticeable, such as the massive boost in autofocus performance and the wide array of excellent video features.

    On the other hand, some shortcomings remain, like the clunky menus and lack of touchscreen functionality. Other issues only present themselves in particular situations, like during continuous shooting when the unfortunately-slow buffer clearing becomes apparent. However, it is also during continuous shooting at eight frames per second when the excellent new electronic viewfinder really shows its stuff.

    The Sony A6300 is a very good mirrorless camera, and delivers a ton of performance and features for its roughly US$1,000 price tag.

    24mm equivalent (16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS lens at 16mm), f/9.0, 1.6s, ISO 100 This image has been modified.

    As more enthusiast photographers move toward full-frame sensors, the Sony A6300 is here to make the claim that there is still a place for crop sensors for serious photographers. Read my Sony A6300 field test to see if this new camera is up to that challenge.

    291mm equivalent (Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS lens at 194mm), f/4.0, 1/640s, ISO 100. This image has been cropped. 

    24mm equivalent (Sony FE 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS lens at 16mm), f/8.0, 1/10s, ISO 100 This image has been modified.

    • Sony A6300 Field Test • Gallery Images • • Overview • Image Quality • Lab Samples • Performance • Buy Now •
    Source: Sony A6300 Field Test: Mirrorless camera offers many improvements and great all-around performance

    Tuesday 26 April 2016

    Olympus AIR A01

    Olympus didn't invent the smartphone add-on camera—Sony was first to market with the QX100 and QX10—but it is attempting to refine the concept with the AIR A01 ($299.99, body only). The small Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera does make some refinements to the concept, and there are some applications for which it's appealing, but it is ergonomically unsound for handheld shooting. If you're just in the market for an inexpensive mirrorless camera, you're better off with another Olympus option, our Editors' Choice, the Olympus PEN E-PL6.

    DesignThe AIR A01 is a small cylinder that measures 1.7 by 2.2 inches (HD) and weighs about 5.2 ounces. It's compatible with Micro Four Thirds lenses—we're reviewing it as a body only, but a kit option is available with the M.Zuiko ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 EZ for $499.99. The AIR is available in a black or white finish.

    The normal array of things you'd expect to see on a camera—an LCD, control dials and switches, and an ergonomic handgrip—are missing. Instead you just get a power button on top, along with a large shutter release control and a status indicator light. A removable smartphone mount at the rear can be adjusted to work with small or large phones—it had no problem fitting an iPhone 6 Plus with a case.

    The mount can be tricky to remove—you'll need to twist it while holding down a catch release on the body. But once it's off you have access to the micro USB port (for data transfer and for charging of the internal, non-removable battery), and the toggle switch to turn the AIR's Wi-Fi on or off (useful if you plan on using it on an airplane or other areas where Wi-Fi is verboten). There's an additional plastic cover you'll need to remove in order to access the microSD memory card slot.

    Holding the AIR with a phone attached is not exactly comfortable. Even when paired with a small prime lens, the camera is a little cumbersome to hold. I used the M.Zuiko 12mm f2 and M.Zuiko 25mm f1.8 during testing. With both lenses I wasn't quite sure whether to hold the AIR by its body, or to hold onto my phone; I ultimately found my grip to be more secure when holding onto the AIR's cylindrical body. It's easier to access on-screen controls when holding onto the phone, but I was always worried about the clip giving way and the AIR falling to the ground when using this method, as it's notably heavier than a smartphone with a lens attached. Those fears proved unfounded, but it doesn't change the fact that the AIR is simply awkward to use as a handheld device.

    There is a standard tripod mount, of course. And if you were thinking about the AIR as a small, inconspicuous camera you can squeeze into a tight spot for remote operation, it's capable. There is some shutter lag when operating it remotely, so it may take some trial and error to get the perfect shot if you're thinking about mounting the camera in a backyard bird feeder or other spot where your subjects would be disturbed by a visible human presence.

    AppThe AIR is best used when paired with its companion app, O.A. Central. Available for Android and iOS, the app connects to the camera via Wi-Fi, streaming a live feed to your phone or tablet's screen. Pairing via Wi-Fi is simple, though if you're already connected to another network, you'll need to manually connect to the AIR's network each time you use it. (This is par for the course with camera Wi-Fi.) The AIR A01 does have Bluetooth, which can wake it from sleep on demand, though you'll still need to manually switch the Wi-Fi network.

    Once everything is connected and communicating, you'll need to choose the mode in which you want to shoot. There are six: Mode Dial, Art Filter, Color Creator, Photo Story, Clips, and Genius. Mode Dial supports traditional camera operation, with control over shutter speed, aperture, and ISO. 

    Filters are built into current Olympus cameras, including the midrange E-M10 Mark II, and act just like the ones you find on Instagram—you can capture images with vivid colors, in sepia tones, with a cross-processed look, in black-and-white, and so on. The Color Creator mode is a bit more targeted—it allows you to tune the standard color output to better suit your taste.

    Photo Story is used to create multi-image collages in-camera. These can be saved in a square format that's ideal for Instagram. Clips is where you'll want to go if you plan on doing any video work that requires editing. You can record video from the standard Mode Dial screen, but Clips adds the ability to assemble short shots into a longer movie.

    Finally there's Genius. It's basically a copy of the Creative Shot feature that Canon puts in many of its PowerShot cameras, like the G5 X. The AIR captures seven photos—your original, as well as six images with varying crops and filters. If you don't mind shooting in JPG—Raw isn't supported in this mode—it's a fun way to snap some photos with a creative look.

    The app isn't without issues. One of note that I ran into during testing—when working with a lens like the Olympus 12mm f/2 that includes a focus clutch system, the AIR had a hard time dealing with switching back and forth between manual and autofocus. Autofocus would regularly stop working, even if the focus clutch was in the autofocus position. I had to put the AIR to sleep and kill the app in order to get autofocus working again.

    I also had some problems connecting in areas with lots of Wi-Fi signals and activities. When I was out in a park there was no lag in connection and I was able to hold the phone in one hand and the AIR in another without issue. But in a Manhattan office building the phone needed to be attached to the camera in order to work, and even then there was some choppiness in the video feed.

    Performance and Image QualityOlympus AIR 01 : Benchmark TestsUsing the phone to control the AIR A01 introduces some slowness. There's a 0.4-second lag between tapping the on-screen shutter button and the AIR capturing an image. If you opt to use the physical shutter button the delay is cut to 0.1-second, the time the camera requires to confirm focus and capture an image. That's on par with other mirrorless cameras. The insanely small Panasonic GM1, for instance, also requires about 0.1-second to confirm focus and fire.

    In terms of burst shooting, the AIR A01 can fire off shots at about 10fps in continuous drive mode. But it's limited as to how many images it can capture at that pace. When shooting Raw+JPG the buffer fills after 9 shots, with the camera slowing considerably to less than 3fps after that. In JPG mode you'll get 11 shots, and the camera doesn't slow down as much—it settles into shooting at about 5.5fps after the initial speed burst and can keep that up for some time.

    Related StorySee How We Test Digital Cameras

    I used Imatest to look at how the AIR's 16-megapixel image sensor stands up to capturing photos at high ISOs. If you're comparing it with your smartphone's sensor, the AIR will absolutely blow it away in terms of detail and noise control. Imatest indicates that the camera controls noise well, keeping it under 1.5 percent through ISO 6400 when shooting JPGs. A close look at photos from our ISO test scene shows that fine detail does take a hit at ISO 6400. But it holds up well at ISO 3200 and ISO 1600, and at ISO 800 is just as good as the Raw output. These are solid results for a mirrorless camera. I did use the highest quality JPG setting for our tests; by default the AIR is set to a more aggressive compression rate, so you'll want to venture into the settings and switch to Xtra Fine to get the best JPG output possible.

    Raw capture is also an option, and it allows you to squeeze more information out of images at higher ISO settings. Raw images retain fine detail even at ISO 6400—although there is a grainy quality to photos when you push the camera that far. ISO 12800 is useable, if you don't mind a grainy image—Raw photos are much sharper than JPGs captured at the camera's top ISO sensitivity.

    The top video quality is a little limited—1080p30 was the cat's meow a few years ago, but now many mirrorless cameras offer the option to push the frame rate to 60fps or the resolution to 4K. The footage, saved in QuickTime format, is crisp and smooth. The AF system reacts promptly to changes in the scene and changes focus with a pleasant, slow rack. Audio is clear when recorded close, but the internal mic does pick up a lot of background noise and you can't add an external one.

    The real complaint is that, since the AIR lacks in-body stabilization, handheld video has a jittery look. You can use a stabilized lens, but your options are limited on the Olympus side of the fence, as most of its cameras put stabilization into the body. Panasonic lenses, which work fine with the AIR, do often have stabilization, and should be a preference if you're keen on shooting steady handheld video.

    ConclusionsThe Olympus AIR A01 is another attempt to create a digital camera that works in conjunction with a smartphone to achieve its fullest potential. But, like other devices of this type, including the similar Sony QX series and the tiny DxO One, it has some issues. The AIR's are mainly ergonomic, although its companion app exhibited behavior that was occasionally quirky. There are conventional cameras available for around the same price that deliver similar image quality and a more pleasant design for handheld use. The Olympus PEN E-PL6 is our Editors' Choice for budget mirrorless compacts—it costs the same with a bundled lens as the AIR A01 does without. If you want something really small, you should also take a gander at the Panasonic GM1. It uses the same Micro Four Thirds lens system and a similar image sensor, and costs about $400 with a bundled zoom lens.


    Source: Olympus AIR A01

    "When the time is right" Canon will enter the Make in India campaign

    In India and probably the world "images" has always been the buzzword for companies like Canon. They have been constantly innovating and bringing new features to their DSLR's, and Point & Shoot cameras. We recently caught up with Mr Andrew Koh, Vice President of Consumer Imaging and Information Center, Canon India, who gave us some good insights of how Canon India's imaging business is doing and where is the company headed. Here is what he had to say:

    What are the camera business plans in anvil for 2016?

    Canon has harnessed imaging know how to develop new and versatile camera models with advanced features and remarkable quality. With the launch of our new cameras in the market in 2016, we see huge potential from our newly launched models like our entry level camera EOS 1300D, our mid level camera EOS 80D and also our mirrorless offerings which give consumers the power of an EOS Camera in a simplified form.

    Apart from this, we have recently launched our flagship model EOS-1DX Mark II which is a high end professional camera. This model has blazingly fast features that boast of a 4K video recording @ 60 fps, dual DIGIC 6+ processor and 14 frames per second.

    Doing what we do best, Canon reckons to bring digital imaging as a realm for the Indian digital culture. This year we are looking to achieve a double-digit growth in the camera business and aim to reach 50% market share in DSLR by end of 2016.

    Is Canon also planning to invest in India with the Make in India platform? If yes, what is the amount (approx.)?

    It would be the head office who would be deciding on this but we need to consider lot many possibilities. There are a lot of factors to consider, such as the infrastructure that can be offered in the countries. When the time is right we will make the announcement but at the moment there is nothing to say.

    Canon EOS M10 mirrorless camera review: The handy DSLR for photography enthusiasts

    Canon EOS M10 is a mirrorless compact DSLR camera by Canon that is priced at Rs 39,095.

    Smartphones are a major competition to Canon digital cameras, how is the company planning to tackle that?

    With smartphones, the number of clicks has increased manifolds. We are happy till the time there is enough clicking happening. Whenever, the young aspiring clickers turn to quality imaging, they will certainly look at either a compact camera or a DSLR.

    There are people in India who have never owned a mobile phone but they buy a smart phone. Likewise for camera technology, there are people who have never used a film camera but straightaway opt for a DSLR camera. This is because they are interested in taking better photos which cannot be captured with a smart-phone camera. Canon has always been the pioneers in manufacturing the best Digital SLR cameras, which newer customers have loved across generations.

    To take our products closer to our customers we have launched a new campaign - "Get ready with EOS 1300D" targeted to multifarious set of buyers who are explorers, p hotography enthusiasts, first time buyers and fence sitters who are considering to buy their first DSLR. Canon has also launched the EOS Academy wherein a panel of photography experts conducts free and paid workshops and seminars on various aspects of photography. To further promote the spirit of photography Canon is conducting workshops in schools to encourage photography.

    Any new camera innovation you would like to talk about, which we might see in the near future from Canon?

    Technology is something that is evolving on daily basis. New camera technology is making it an exciting time for amateurs as well as professional photographers. At Canon we're firm believers in breaking new technology to the market. And this is a philosophy that we bring to our products as well. We lead the world with our innovative products that realize high-quality images using groundbreaking technologies such as proprietary lenses, CMOS sensors and image processors.

    This ensures perfect harmony in the working of these components together and we call this the 'Canon Digital Trinity'. There are several areas in which we can expect some new trends in camera technology. For instance, improvements in sensor and lens design, which means DSLR camera sensors, will feature increasingly higher resolution. A good example is our EOS 5DS and EOS 5DSR that has 50.6 megapixel full frame sensors making them the highest resolution full frame DSLR cameras in the world. Apart from this we will see photographic devices evolve in terms of features and usability, as well as an expansion in features. A good example is 4K video recording which earlier was the singular domain of our high end cinema EOS range of cameras but with the EOS-1DX Mark II launch, it has percolated down to our DSLR cameras as well. Live View focusing technology for DSLR camera models will also improve, and we will see more and more cameras featuring touch screen LCDs for easy user interface.
    Source: "When the time is right" Canon will enter the Make in India campaign

    Sunday 24 April 2016

    Do You Really Need a Small Camera for Street Photography?

    We are living in an era in which everyone complains about their bulky camera gear and how hard it is to carry it all day. Many photographers are now switching to mirrorless cameras for this reason. But hey, there is another solution for that: You can minimize your lenses and other gear, rather than changing your main camera body. That's what I did. 

    First of all, I'm not a supporter of a specific brand or a gear fetishist guy. I started photography with a Nikon film camera, then bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D80. I used the D3 and D300 mostly for shoots. Later on, I switched to Canon (1D Mark III & 5D Mark II), and last year, I bought a Nikon D810 because of its wide dynamic range and higher megapixel count. I buy and use the camera bodies that work best for me. To make a long story short, the brand doesn't matter for me. 

    I've been mostly shooting fashion and commercial images in the studio, but recently, I started traveling more, and I decided to carry my camera with me all the time, just like before, when I first started photography. I was passionate, and I just wanted to shoot everything, everywhere. I guess I missed that feeling. Because when your hobby becomes your profession, sometimes, you have to take a break and decide to do whatever you really like for a while. For me, it is street photography, and as we all know, for street photography, every ounce matters.

    I will not argue about the weight of the D810 or some other big camera bodies. However, I like using a DSLR, and I don't want to switch to any Sony full-frame mirrorless camera just for this reason (not until Sony produces a battery that lets me shoot 1,000 images per charge). I just don't want to follow the herd. Actually, until last year, I never had concerns about the weight of the equipment I use. But time is the only truth, and we are all getting old. I wanted to get back into street photography, but unfortunately, I didn't feel I had the same energy for carrying all my heavy gear as I did in my early 20s. After years of long day work, including hours of sitting and doing retouching, I started to have back pain for the first time in my life last year. It was a vital signal from my body, so it led me to take it seriously and do something about this weight issue. 

    Getting Rid of the Unnecessary Accessories

    I've been using battery grips since my first DSLR, but from now on, for outdoor shooting or daily photo walks, I leave them at home. A single attached battery is always enough for these kinds of occasions anyway. Also, some other accessories that I rarely use such as a viewfinder magnifier, LCD hood, etc. now stay in my cabinet as well. I was able to shoot without these items before, so I can shoot without them again, no big deal. Hence, all I wanted was just a small camera bag. 

    Switching to Prime Lenses

    Most of us own 24-70mm lenses, and we all believe that those are the most flexible lenses for most situations. I used Canon, Sigma, and Tamron 24-70mm lenses on different DSLR bodies, and I must admit that they are really big and heavy lenses. During the time that I owned a Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD, I realized that I usually prevented myself from holding my camera or even taking it out of my bag. So, I sold my Tamron that weighed 845g and bought a Nikkor 28mm f/1.8G in addition to my other primes, the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G and Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G. In terms of weight and price, 1.8G series prime lenses were the best choices for me. Here is the best part: a 28mm and 85mm lens duo weigh less than the Tamron 24-70 alone, and when they are attached to my D810, the combination doesn't feel heavy. Plus, the Nikkor 28mm f/1.8G is a Nano-coated lens, and with its unique focal length that's different than the usual 35mm focal length, I think it is great for street photography. 

    One of the other advantages of using budget primes is that I can carry and use small ND and circular polarizing filters all the time, particularly because both the Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G and Nikkor 28mm f/1.8G have the same filter thread size: 67mm. So, I got the chance to get rid of my square filter adapters, holder, and big filter case as well. With these compact but high quality lenses, I'm happy with my "bulky" but perfect DSLR. 

    Well, I handled the weight issue, but what about the myth of the necessity of owning a small camera for street photography? You may think that you should buy a Fuji, Sony, or Olympus compact camera, but as I stated before, I just like shooting with my Nikon DSLR. Some say that you should cover yourself and your camera for street photography, but I disagree with that. We are photographers. If you want to shoot candid street images, you don't have to hide a small black camera under your jacket like agents during the Cold War. No one can blame you because you are holding a big camera in a public place. It is your attitude rather than your gear's size that matters. Streets are full of mobile phone photographers and selfie takers. Many people own DSLR, mirrorless, or compact cameras and use them every day. It's 2016, and people have gotten used to seeing other people with cameras everywhere. Don't get stuck on the essentials of being a street photographer, because there are no essentials! Let's just say there are marketing tricks. You can read everywhere that you need to own a small camera that won't attract your subjects for street photography. Well, if this is your concern, use your mobile phone, and shoot your subject while pretending to be talking on the phone. 

    Briefly, I'm happy with less. When I walk around with a single lens and body, I just concentrate on my photography and abilities with my current gear setup. So, what are your thoughts about this? Should street photographers hide themselves and their cameras or interact with their subjects? Should they love and use the gear they own effectively, or save money to buy a Leica? Is weight an issue for you?


    Source: Do You Really Need a Small Camera for Street Photography?

    Saturday 23 April 2016

    What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next one

    So you're in the market for a new camera, possibly your first serious camera, but you can't decide what to plump for. Look no further: in a bid to help connect you with your ideal camera, we look at what factors you need to consider when identifying your own photographic needs, and then break down the different types of camera on offer.

    Things to consider

    First off, there is no single best camera. There is, however, the best camera for you, and that's going to be based on things such as what subjects you want to shoot, whether you prioritize image quality or portability, if you are willing to learn how to get the most out of a camera, and how much you want to spend.

    We'll start off with the factors which are probably going to influence your decision the most: how much you're happy to shell out, and what you'll be willing to carry around. Yes, that top-of-the-range Fujifilm X-Pro 2 camera might look perfect, but if you can't afford it, you need to consider which specifications you are willing to sacrifice to come in on budget.

    Equally, there's no point buying a fantastic (but large) camera like the Canon 1D X II only to leave it at home all the time because it's too big and heavy to carry. Also, remember that as you add more, or bigger, lenses to an interchangeable lens system, it will get considerably heavier, and more expensive. We're all too aware of the phenomenon which sees camera kits get inexplicably bigger after late-night eBay sessions.

    Your next big consideration should probably be what you want to take photos of. It might sound silly, but you could easily end up spending hundreds of dollars on gear you don't really need, by not giving this sufficient thought. Your subject will often determine what aperture or focal length lenses you need, what focusing systems will give you the most keepers, and how fast you need to be able to take photos.

    Think about it this way: if you want to zoom in on distant subjects, there's no point having a camera with a fixed prime lens like the Ricoh GR II or Sony RX1R II. Equally, if you are planning on shooting a fast moving subject, whether professional sports or your kids running around in your garden, you'll need fast focusing which could come in the form of cameras like the Nikon D5, or the Sony A6300.

    Image quality will obviously also be something to consider. As we've said before, one of the biggest factors controlling this is the size of image sensor used in a camera. A bigger sensor gives better quality images, especially in lower light. But that's not to say the small sensor of the Samsung Galaxy S7, or the one-inch-type of the Nikon 1 system, can't deliver great images in the right conditions and with the right lenses, so again you need to think about exactly how you will use it.

    While the old marker of camera quality was its megapixel count, most cameras will now take images with enough resolution to keep most people happy most of the time. The majority fall in the 14 to 24-megapixel range which is plenty for large prints, and (probably more relevant today) viewing on high resolution screens. If you need more resolution there are cameras like the Canon 5DS or Sony A7R II.

    There are also other considerations you wouldn't have had to give a second thought to a couple of years ago. Many cameras can now shoot high quality video at up to 4K and make buying a dedicated camcorder feel redundant for most people. Built-in wireless connectivity also gives users the ability to share photos on Instagram seconds after they were taken, and even control a camera remotely. This means no more setting the timer and trying to run back to the rest of the family in time for a group portrait.

    What we are saying is that there are lots of things to consider before choosing a camera. Once you've done this you'll probably have a list of characteristics and features you can't live without, and another list of things you'd ideally like in your new camera.

    Smartphone

    The chances are you already have a very capable camera sitting in your pocket. Smartphone cameras have improved so much in recent years, gaining features including optical image stabilization and wide aperture lenses, that they are often now better than many compact point-and-shoots from a couple of years ago.

    Smartphone cameras are great for users who want to travel light and are unwilling to carry a dedicated camera. They are perfect for snapping everyday photos, and sharing instantly. While in the right hands they are capable of turning out amazing images, you are still going to get better quality images from a dedicated camera, especially in lower light conditions.

    The best thing about smartphone cameras is how portable they are and the fact you've probably got one with you when you see something you want to photograph. The ability to edit your images on them and share them instantly is also a massive benefit for the social media generation. However most only feature a fixed focal length lens, meaning you are left zooming with your feet (the digital zooming you do on your phone is basically pre-shot cropping).

    Compact

    Compact cameras come in a number of shapes and sizes including the classic point-and-shoot, enthusiast-friendly models, bridge cameras with massive zooms, and large-sensored cameras with a prime lens. What they have in common is permanently attached lenses, which means you don't get to swap the glass to suit your subject. That said, a handful of compacts like the Fujifilm X100T or Ricoh GR II do have the option of wide-angle or telephoto convertor lens add-ons.

    This sort of camera is often good for users who prioritize portability and simplicity, and you don't have to make the same sacrifice in image quality you would have just a few years ago. Pocketable compacts like the Panasonic ZS100 or Sony RX100 IV now pack larger sensors and fast zoom lenses making them good everyday or travel cameras. Meanwhile devices like the Sony RX1R II can genuinely offer the same image quality as much bigger cameras, for those willing to make do with a fixed prime lenses.

    Unlike traditional point-and-shoot cameras which have been all but made redundant by smartphones, the new breed of quality compacts still have a lot to offer over your iPhone 6S or Huawei P9. This increasingly includes big sensors, fast autofocus, and physical access to manual controls. Meanwhile built-in Wi-Fi means images can be shared almost as fast as those shot with a smartphone. If you can find space for a compact in your bag or jacket, you will end up with better quality images than simply whipping out your phone. However, what compacts can't do is offer the combination of versatility and quality of interchangeable lens cameras.

    Action-cam / Tough

    Sometimes you need a camera which can survive in adverse conditions, or take the odd knock. Action and tough cameras are designed to take a bashing. While action cameras are often used to shoot videos of extreme exploits, tough cameras are more traditional compact cameras which can still cope with being submerged in water or dropped on the floor.

    Action cameras are best suited for people who want to record video footage of their activities, though can also be use to snap still images. Like the ubiquitous GoPro offerings, they tend to feature very wide-angle lenses which give an immersive perspective. As such, they are not suited to everyday photography. Editing footage can also be labor intensive, though newer cameras like the TomTom Bandit now make editing easier.

    Tough cameras can offer equivalent ruggedness, but are designed for more traditional photography. Cameras like the Olympus TG-4 or Ricoh WG-4 GPS, are essentially compact cameras in protective armor. With the exception of the odd camera like the (very expensive) Leica X-U, action and tough camera are focused on this ruggedness at the cost of image quality, so unless your camera is going to take a bashing, you probably don't need one.

    Mirrorless

    Unlike the cameras we've looked at so far, mirrorless cameras are interchangeable lens cameras. This means lenses can be swapped allowing you to select the best one for your subjects. This instantly makes mirrorless cameras (at least potentially) much more versatile than a camera with a fixed lens. They also tend to have much more capable performance than most fixed lens cameras.

    The main difference between mirrorless cameras and the DSLRs we'll come to next, is that mirrorless cameras, as the name suggests, lack the mirror which features in traditional DSLRs. This allows mirrorless cameras to be significantly smaller. Some, like the Canon EOS M3, are not much bigger than a compact, while others like the Leica SL are as big as some DSLRs. However, this also means these cameras lack the optical viewfinder of DSLRs. That said, the electronic viewfinders on some mirrorless cameras (not all have one) are much better than they were a few years ago.

    The performance of mirrorless cameras ranges from that which will keep beginners happy, to that demanded by professionals. Sensor size and image quality also varies, with most mirrorless cameras using sensors from the one-inch-types used in the Nikon 1 series, to the full frame sensors of the Sony A7 line. As such there's a mirrorless camera out there for the needs of anyone whether you want pocketable or ultimate quality.

    Mirrorless cameras are almost certainly the future of photography and have many benefits over DSLRs, such as their size (and that of accompanying lenses) and generally better video capabilities, they also tend to have more mod cons such as sensor shift image stabilization, and built-in wireless capabilities. However, there are still some drawbacks to them. These include the more limited battery life, and that there are generally not as many compatible lenses for them.

    DSLR

    DSLRs look like the sort of camera you have probably seen enthusiast and professional photographers using for decades. They are generally black and quite bulky, and are indeed the digital offspring of the SLR cameras you might remember from the film days.

    Because they're based on previous generations of camera, DSLRs are often compatible with a great number of lenses and use either APS-C or full frame image sensors. This means they offer an image quality only equaled by compact or mirrorless cameras with the same size sensor. Auto-focus and general photography performance is also normally up there – either equaling or bettering mirrorless cameras at the same price point.

    While DSLRs might be beginning to feel dated, there are still a number of reasons they might be right for you. Firstly, if you already have a selection of compatible lenses, they are going to be more affordable than buying into new systems. DSLRs can also offer a compelling level of performance and quality given their cost.

    However, the film-based heritage of DSLRs also means they have a few disadvantages over mirrorless cameras. The big one is size, the use of a mirror instantly makes DSLRs significantly larger. It also limits burst shooting speeds (with the mirror generally moving between shots) and means video functions do not feel as integrated.

    Other

    While the aforementioned camera types will make up the majority of new camera purchases, there are plenty of other more specialist devices out there. These include new 360 degree cameras like the Ricoh Theta S and the upcoming Nikon KeyMission 360 as well as film cameras, and instant cameras like the Impossible Project I-1 and Fujifilm Instax offerings. There are also smartphone add-on cameras like the DxO One, and family-friendly shooters like the Nikon S33. Given the varied but more specialist nature of this category, the sort of people who are buying these cameras generally already know what they can do, along with their relative positives and negatives.

    What will you opt for?

    Hopefully this guide has given you an idea about what type of camera will suit your needs best. You may have come to the conclusion that you're best off with a smartphone, or maybe that a fixed prime lens compact camera is right for you.

    If you are opting for an interchangeable lens camera to achieve your photographic ambitions, you'll not only have to decide between mirrorless and DSLR, but also which brand. This is important because lenses can't generally be used across different brands easily. Brands use specific lens mounts, so if you buy into one system, you'll have an investment in it, and will probably be less inclined to switch to something else in the future.

    While we've tried to highlight a few of our favorite cameras in each category as we've gone along, there are (as we've said once or twice) loads more vying for your attention. Whatever camera you end up opting for, we hope you enjoy getting out there and using it.


    Source: What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next one

    Friday 22 April 2016

    What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next camera

    So you're in the market for a new camera, possibly your first serious camera, but you can't decide what to plump for. Look no further: in a bid to help connect you with your ideal camera, we look at what factors you need to consider when identifying your own photographic needs, and then break down the different types of camera on offer.

    Things to consider

    First off, there is no single best camera. There is, however, the best camera for you, and that's going to be based on things such as what subjects you want to shoot, whether you prioritize image quality or portability, if you are willing to learn how to get the most out of a camera, and how much you want to spend.

    We'll start off with the factors which are probably going to influence your decision the most: how much you're happy to shell out, and what you'll be willing to carry around. Yes, that top-of-the-range Fujifilm X-Pro 2 camera might look perfect, but if you can't afford it, you need to consider which specifications you are willing to sacrifice to come in on budget.

    Equally, there's no point buying a fantastic (but large) camera like the Canon 1D X II only to leave it at home all the time because it's too big and heavy to carry. Also, remember that as you add more, or bigger, lenses to an interchangeable lens system, it will get considerably heavier, and more expensive. We're all too aware of the phenomenon which sees camera kits get inexplicably bigger after late-night eBay sessions.

    Your next big consideration should probably be what you want to take photos of. It might sound silly, but you could easily end up spending hundreds of dollars on gear you don't really need, by not giving this sufficient thought. Your subject will often determine what aperture or focal length lenses you need, what focusing systems will give you the most keepers, and how fast you need to be able to take photos.

    Think about it this way: if you want to zoom in on distant subjects, there's no point having a camera with a fixed prime lens like the Ricoh GR II or Sony RX1R II. Equally, if you are planning on shooting a fast moving subject, whether professional sports or your kids running around in your garden, you'll need fast focusing which could come in the form of cameras like the Nikon D5, or the Sony A6300.

    Image quality will obviously also be something to consider. As we've said before, one of the biggest factors controlling this is the size of image sensor used in a camera. A bigger sensor gives better quality images, especially in lower light. But that's not to say the small sensor of the Samsung Galaxy S7, or the one-inch-type of the Nikon 1 system, can't deliver great images in the right conditions and with the right lenses, so again you need to think about exactly how you will use it.

    While the old marker of camera quality was its megapixel count, most cameras will now take images with enough resolution to keep most people happy most of the time. The majority fall in the 14 to 24-megapixel range which is plenty for large prints, and (probably more relevant today) viewing on high resolution screens. If you need more resolution there are cameras like the Canon 5DS or Sony A7R II.

    There are also other considerations you wouldn't have had to give a second thought to a couple of years ago. Many cameras can now shoot high quality video at up to 4K and make buying a dedicated camcorder feel redundant for most people. Built-in wireless connectivity also gives users the ability to share photos on Instagram seconds after they were taken, and even control a camera remotely. This means no more setting the timer and trying to run back to the rest of the family in time for a group portrait.

    What we are saying is that there are lots of things to consider before choosing a camera. Once you've done this you'll probably have a list of characteristics and features you can't live without, and another list of things you'd ideally like in your new camera.

    Smartphone

    The chances are you already have a very capable camera sitting in your pocket. Smartphone cameras have improved so much in recent years, gaining features including optical image stabilization and wide aperture lenses, that they are often now better than many compact point-and-shoots from a couple of years ago.

    Smartphone cameras are great for users who want to travel light and are unwilling to carry a dedicated camera. They are perfect for snapping everyday photos, and sharing instantly. While in the right hands they are capable of turning out amazing images, you are still going to get better quality images from a dedicated camera, especially in lower light conditions.

    The best thing about smartphone cameras is how portable they are and the fact you've probably got one with you when you see something you want to photograph. The ability to edit your images on them and share them instantly is also a massive benefit for the social media generation. However most only feature a fixed focal length lens, meaning you are left zooming with your feet (the digital zooming you do on your phone is basically pre-shot cropping).

    Compact

    Compact cameras come in a number of shapes and sizes including the classic point-and-shoot, enthusiast-friendly models, bridge cameras with massive zooms, and large-sensored cameras with a prime lens. What they have in common is permanently attached lenses, which means you don't get to swap the glass to suit your subject. That said, a handful of compacts like the Fujifilm X100T or Ricoh GR II do have the option of wide-angle or telephoto convertor lens add-ons.

    This sort of camera is often good for users who prioritize portability and simplicity, and you don't have to make the same sacrifice in image quality you would have just a few years ago. Pocketable compacts like the Panasonic ZS100 or Sony RX100 IV now pack larger sensors and fast zoom lenses making them good everyday or travel cameras. Meanwhile devices like the Sony RX1R II can genuinely offer the same image quality as much bigger cameras, for those willing to make do with a fixed prime lenses.

    Unlike traditional point-and-shoot cameras which have been all but made redundant by smartphones, the new breed of quality compacts still have a lot to offer over your iPhone 6S or Huawei P9. This increasingly includes big sensors, fast autofocus, and physical access to manual controls. Meanwhile built-in Wi-Fi means images can be shared almost as fast as those shot with a smartphone. If you can find space for a compact in your bag or jacket, you will end up with better quality images than simply whipping out your phone. However, what compacts can't do is offer the combination of versatility and quality of interchangeable lens cameras.

    Action-cam / Tough

    Sometimes you need a camera which can survive in adverse conditions, or take the odd knock. Action and tough cameras are designed to take a bashing. While action cameras are often used to shoot videos of extreme exploits, tough cameras are more traditional compact cameras which can still cope with being submerged in water or dropped on the floor.

    Action cameras are best suited for people who want to record video footage of their activities, though can also be use to snap still images. Like the ubiquitous GoPro offerings, they tend to feature very wide-angle lenses which give an immersive perspective. As such, they are not suited to everyday photography. Editing footage can also be labor intensive, though newer cameras like the TomTom Bandit now make editing easier.

    Tough cameras can offer equivalent ruggedness, but are designed for more traditional photography. Cameras like the Olympus TG-4 or Ricoh WG-4 GPS, are essentially compact cameras in protective armor. With the exception of the odd camera like the (very expensive) Leica X-U, action and tough camera are focused on this ruggedness at the cost of image quality, so unless your camera is going to take a bashing, you probably don't need one.

    Mirrorless

    Unlike the cameras we've looked at so far, mirrorless cameras are interchangeable lens cameras. This means lenses can be swapped allowing you to select the best one for your subjects. This instantly makes mirrorless cameras (at least potentially) much more versatile than a camera with a fixed lens. They also tend to have much more capable performance than most fixed lens cameras.

    The main difference between mirrorless cameras and the DSLRs we'll come to next, is that mirrorless cameras, as the name suggests, lack the mirror which features in traditional DSLRs. This allows mirrorless cameras to be significantly smaller. Some, like the Canon EOS M3, are not much bigger than a compact, while others like the Leica SL are as big as some DSLRs. However, this also means these cameras lack the optical viewfinder of DSLRs. That said, the electronic viewfinders on some mirrorless cameras (not all have one) are much better than they were a few years ago.

    The performance of mirrorless cameras ranges from that which will keep beginners happy, to that demanded by professionals. Sensor size and image quality also varies, with most mirrorless cameras using sensors from the one-inch-types used in the Nikon 1 series, to the full frame sensors of the Sony A7 line. As such there's a mirrorless camera out there for the needs of anyone whether you want pocketable or ultimate quality.

    Mirrorless cameras are almost certainly the future of photography and have many benefits over DSLRs, such as their size (and that of accompanying lenses) and generally better video capabilities, they also tend to have more mod cons such as sensor shift image stabilization, and built-in wireless capabilities. However, there are still some drawbacks to them. These include the more limited battery life, and that there are generally not as many compatible lenses for them.

    DSLR

    DSLRs look like the sort of camera you have probably seen enthusiast and professional photographers using for decades. They are generally black and quite bulky, and are indeed the digital offspring of the SLR cameras you might remember from the film days.

    Because they're based on previous generations of camera, DSLRs are often compatible with a great number of lenses and use either APS-C or full frame image sensors. This means they offer an image quality only equaled by compact or mirrorless cameras with the same size sensor. Auto-focus and general photography performance is also normally up there – either equaling or bettering mirrorless cameras at the same price point.

    While DSLRs might be beginning to feel dated, there are still a number of reasons they might be right for you. Firstly, if you already have a selection of compatible lenses, they are going to be more affordable than buying into new systems. DSLRs can also offer a compelling level of performance and quality given their cost.

    However, the film-based heritage of DSLRs also means they have a few disadvantages over mirrorless cameras. The big one is size, the use of a mirror instantly makes DSLRs significantly larger. It also limits burst shooting speeds (with the mirror generally moving between shots) and means video functions do not feel as integrated.

    Other

    While the aforementioned camera types will make up the majority of new camera purchases, there are plenty of other more specialist devices out there. These include new 360 degree cameras like the Ricoh Theta S and the upcoming Nikon KeyMission 360 as well as film cameras, and instant cameras like the Impossible Project I-1 and Fujifilm Instax offerings. There are also smartphone add-on cameras like the DxO One, and family-friendly shooters like the Nikon S33. Given the varied but more specialist nature of this category, the sort of people who are buying these cameras generally already know what they can do, along with their relative positives and negatives.

    What will you opt for?

    Hopefully this guide has given you an idea about what type of camera will suit your needs best. You may have come to the conclusion that you're best off with a smartphone, or maybe that a fixed prime lens compact camera is right for you.

    If you are opting for an interchangeable lens camera to achieve your photographic ambitions, you'll not only have to decide between mirrorless and DSLR, but also which brand. This is important because lenses can't generally be used across different brands easily. Brands use specific lens mounts, so if you buy into one system, you'll have an investment in it, and will probably be less inclined to switch to something else in the future.

    While we've tried to highlight a few of our favorite cameras in each category as we've gone along, there are (as we've said once or twice) loads more vying for your attention. Whatever camera you end up opting for, we hope you enjoy getting out there and using it.


    Source: What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next camera

    Wednesday 20 April 2016

    Sony A6300: The Mirrorless Wonder is Now in India

    By SiliconIndia   |   Tuesday, 19 April 2016, 22:03 Hrs

    BENGALURU: Back in February, Sony launched a new camera in US; sending photographers all over the world into a meltdown and the device has finally arrived in India. It's the Sony Alpha 6300. Hailed as the successor to the A6000 model, the most popular mirrorless camera ever, the A6300 promises to be in the same line as another mirrorless wonder from Sony, perhaps even better. What's more, the camera is priced aggressively at Rs. 74,990, which includes a 16-50 mm lens.

    According to Sony, the A6300 has the world's fastest autofocus (AF) system among APS-C interchangeable cameras at 0.05 seconds. The AF system in the device is similar to the one found in the more advanced A7R II and A7 II cameras, with an astonishing 425 phase detection points. The device features the same 4D AF system seen in the A6000, but more refined and undeniably faster. At the core, the camera has an all new 24.2 megapixels APS-C Exmor CMOS sensor coupled with a BIONZ X image processing engine.

    Being a tech company, Sony's rise to the top of the camera market has been an amazing achievement. One reason for Sony's growth, as experts point out, is its ability to combine superior still photography along with high quality video shooting capabilities, taking it way ahead of its competition.   The A6300 is another camera that supports this statement as it produces sharp 4K videos at a bit rate of 100 Mbps with additional features like super-slow motion 1080p video at 120fps.

    Built on a full magnesium alloy body, Sony claims the A6300 is resistant to dust and moisture. It has Wi-Fi and NFC compatibility for wireless data transfer and is fully functional with Sony's PlayMemories Mobile application, which is available for Android and iOS platforms. On the downside, the device does not feature touch screen that can be cumbersome for amateur photographers, as it takes time to settle with Sony's menu system. But a mirrorless wonder at Rs. 75,000; it's a bargain for sure.

    Read Also: 5 Tablets Ready to Takeover Laptops in the FutureHuawei Launches New VR Headset with 360-degree Sound


    Source: Sony A6300: The Mirrorless Wonder is Now in India

    Tuesday 19 April 2016

    Sony A6300 mirrorless 4K camera arrives for Rs 74990

    The Sony A6300 has finally made its way to India, a few months after the camera made its global debut.

    Sony a6300 comes with support for full live-view continuous shooting on the Tru-Finder or via LCD screen at up to 8 fps. The camera can record high resolution 4K video with full pixel readout and no pixel binning in the popular Super 35mm format for up to 29 minutes. Its title feature is the updated 4D Focus system, where the company claims the camera can lock focus on a subject in as little as 50 milliseconds. This combined with the high-density tracking AF technology helps it to quickly follow moving objects in action and perform almost twice as fast as its predecessor. The Sony a6300 features a 24.2MP APS-C Exmor CMOS image sensor with ISO sensitivity ranging between 100 - 51200. The camera will then adjust them according to the subject's motion.

    Sony is also touting the ruggedness of the camera.

    The sensor features a wide dynamic range-in 14 stops of exposur e-enabling a greater color gamut and brightness depth in images, along with increased latitude during post processing.

    If you are looking to create some quality video content for your latest 4K TV, the a6300's got your back.

    The main center of attention when it comes to the mirrorless Sony A6300 is its lightning-quick autofocus abilities thanks to an all-new 4D Focus system. The cost includes the 16-50mm lens.

    The α6300 camera is equipped with a high contrast, high-resolution XGA OLED Tru-Finder with approximately 2.4 million dots that offers exceptional corner-to-corner visibility.

    This camera has magnesium alloy design. On the body are nine customizable buttons that can be assigned from a mix of 64 different functions, enabling the camera to be configured for individual shooting styles.

    It is also Wi-Fi and NFC compatible and fully functional with Sony's PlayMemories Mobile application available for Android and iOS platforms, as well as Sony's growin g range of PlayMemories Camera Apps, which add a variety of creative capabilities to the camera. Nothing new here, but it supports QR code pairing for non-NFC devices, similar to how Olympus cameras pair with phones and tablets.

    Houston recovering from yet another deadly floodAnother north Houston resident posted video of residents leaving their flooded homes in a canoe as the rain continued to fall. Officials say at least four people were found dead in their vehicles during extreme flooding across the Houston area Monday .


    Source: Sony A6300 mirrorless 4K camera arrives for Rs 74990

    Monday 18 April 2016

    Canon M3 review: Mirrorless camera for masses

    Canon is big on DSLR cameras. And on the compact point-and-shooters. But probably because of its strong position in these two segments, the company hasn't tried very hard in mirrorless market. It has been slow to react to the mirrorless trend. However, the pressure from companies like Sony and Fuji is now pushing Canon.

    The company's new Canon M3 camera in India is its attempt to show that it can also make a good mirrorless camera. Canon surely has the brand image to make any camera a success in the market. With the M3, it is also throwing in the mix a fairly aggressive price. The Canon M3 has been priced at Rs 49,995 along with the kit-lens of 18-55mm.

    This is a good deal for a mirrorless camera like the M3. Or at least it seems on the paper. So can the M3 be your next camera?

    Design, build quality and controls

    After struggling in the wilderness for some time, the mirrorless cameras are finally finding the right design. The M3 definitely gets it right. It is compact enough to be carelessly tossed inside a bag and yet is hefty enough to feel sizeable in hands. The whole camera body is made of metal, so it feels very sturdy and well-built. But at the right side of the camera, there is a layer of thick rubber-like material that covers the whole grip-area. The grip is not very deep but for a mirrorless camera it is chunky and helps a shooter hold the camera securely while clicking images.

    It is easy to carry the M3 in a bag and easier still to use it when you are in a tight spot where a DSLR camera would be a burden

    In fact, this grip is one area where it is easy to see Canon utilise its expertise in camera making to the fullest. The rounded edge and the cuts created in the grip makes the M3 a joy to hold, relative to other mirrorless cameras.  

    On top of the camera there are two dials. While the bigger dial allows a user to select from different shooting modes, the smaller one provides direct control to exposure compensation, which is a welcome addition. If you are coming from a point-and-shoot camera, you will find the M3 easy enough to use. Just keep it on the auto, at least in the beginning, and let it do its magic. If you are coming from a DSLR, you will find the controls somewhat lacking. But that is normal. The good news with the M3 is that most of its buttons are configurable. This means, spend a week or two with it, and you will be able to set it up the way you like it.

    Also Read: Canon Powershot G9X review: Punching above its weight

    It also helps that the screen in the camera is touch-sensitive. You won't realise how big of a deal this is until you use one. The focusing and composing images are just all that more easier with a touchscreen camera.

    Overall, we find the M3 one of the better designed mirrorless cameras in the market. The build quality is fantastic, the options to customise the controls are plenty and the touchscreen makes it handier to operate.

    With a lens like 18-55mm attached to it, the M3 makes for a fairly compact camera. No, it won't fit in your jeans pocket or for that matter even the jacket pocket. But it is easy to carry the M3 in a bag and easier still to use it when you are in a tight spot where DSLR camera would be a burden.

    Performance The big deal with the M3 is that it packs in the photography hardware that is very similar to what you get in a crop-sized or in other words APS-C Canon camera like Canon 750D. It has a 24-megapixel image sensor and a fully-functional 49-point focus system. And it works like a camera that is true to its hardware.

    Although, nowadays in cameras there are many moving parts and the performance is rarely absolute good or bad. Overall, the M3 performance is a mixed bag. When it comes to actual image quality, the camera excels. The M3 is the kind of camera that will be used mostly on auto made, and that is also where it is strongest. In most lighting conditions, it nails the white balance, and the JPEG images that come out of it have excellent colours. The metering, however, tends to err on the side of underexposure. Although once you get the hang of the camera and understand how it sees the scenes, you can easily fix this by using the handy exposure compensation dial.

    For its class, the overall focus speed of the M3 is on the slower side. Of course, it is faster than smaller cameras and is capable of freezing hyperactive pets into a frame. But DSLR cameras in this price range as well as cameras like the Sony A6000 are faster than the M3, especially in low light, at acquiring focus and tracking subjects.

    Also Read: Using Sony A6000: Can a mirrorless camera make you dump bulky DSLR?

    Cameras nowadays have become very good at creating images. And whether you pick a Nikon or a Canon camera, you will be able to create beautiful images. Although, learning to creating such images with the M3 takes slightly longer. Reason? It falls a little short on the dynamic range part. This also makes the job of the photographer a bit more trickier. You have to get exposure absolutely right because unlike say Sony A6000, the M3 doesn't give all that much leeway to lift shadows in post-processing.

    The M3 can shoot RAW images although most of the time the JPEGs are not only good enough but also more convenient.

    Also Read: Shooting wildlife with mirrorless camera? It's complicated

    One bit where the M3 truly excels is at handling noise. It churns out images that are extremely clean. It supports ISO of as high as 12800. Even in alarmingly low light, the camera makes sure that the noise is at minimum, which means most of the time you get clean images with contrasty colours.

    But we said that the M3 performance is a mixed bag. Right? The area where it falters is its battery life. Once charged 100 per cent, the battery in M3 lasts around 180 to 200 shots, which is on the lower side.

    Should you buy it

    The Canon M3 is a very good camera and its price of Rs 49,995 is aggressive. It all depends on what you are looking to do from your camera. If you want a mirrorless camera, the M3 should be definitely on your radar. But at the same time, Sony A6000 sells for a similar price and is overall a better camera than the M3.

    This whole M3 vs A6000 is a rather interesting fight. The Sony's camera has a better image sensor and is overall a better performer. But the lens that Sony bundles with the A6000 is pathetic. The M3, on the other hand, has a better design and feels better in hands. The 18-55mm lens bundled with it is not some real hot shot like Canon's L lenses, but then it is better than what Sony gives. Finally, there is the ecosystem. Canon, because of its apathetic attitude towards mirrorless camera, for now has just a handful of lenses that support M3 lens mount. Sony offers more lenses, including premium lenses, for A6000.

    To make it simple for you, let's summarise this. If you are spending Rs 50,000 on your mirrorless camera and don't intend to buy any other lens, the M3 is the camera you can buy. It is also easy to use and most of the time churns out nice images without much fuss. But if you intend to get into the photography with serious aspirations and want to do so with a mirrorless camera, the A6000 is a better deal. Sony offers a shooter that is more versatile and capable. 

  • Good stuff
  • Very good image quality
  • Good ISO performance
  • Aggressive price
  • Superb design
  • Bad stuff
  • Not enough lenses
  • Sensor weak on DR
  • Average battery life
  • Sluggish performance
  • For more news from India Today, follow us on Twitter @indiatoday and on Facebook at facebook.com/IndiaTodayFor news and videos in Hindi, go to AajTak.in.ताज़ातरीन ख़बरों और वीडियो के लिए आजतक.इन पर आएं.


    Source: Canon M3 review: Mirrorless camera for masses

    Saturday 16 April 2016

    Sequel to most popular mirrorless camera is a step up

    Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com 9:03 a.m. EDT April 16, 2016

    Sony's A6300: Newer. Better. Faster. Stronger.(Photo: Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com)

    Sony has finally revealed the long-awaited follow-up to its mega-popular A6000 mirrorless camera, the new Sony Alpha A6300 (MSRP $999 body-only). The A6000 scored points with users thanks to its combination of small size, big performance, and affordable price. While Sony has billed the A6300 as the successor to the A6000, we think it's more like a big brother–largely due to the improved performance and, subsequently, the inflated price.

    Even with the price increase, the A6300 doesn't shortchange users on performance, as it's simply one of the best mirrorless cameras we've tested to date. But as a result it's competing with much more expensive cameras than the A6000 ever did. While it might not replicate exactly what made the A6000 great, it's so good it'll likely pave its own road to success.

    Compared to some of its peers, the A6300 is rather simple in terms of design—I suppose my biggest complaint about it is that it simply lacks character. However, Sony did a great job in almost every other respect. That includes the beautiful 2.4 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF), which comes in handy on bright, sunny days.

    The A6300 is not a large camera, so portability is certainly a pro. (Photo: Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com)

    The A6300 performs well in an impressive range of lighting conditions thanks to sensitivity that goes up to ISO 51,200. That said, images are a bit noisy if you're not using any noise reduction settings, so I recommend setting it to "low" if you plan on shooting above ISO 1,600.

    Sony says that it has once again set the bar for autofocusing speed, claiming that the A6300 takes just 0.05 seconds to focus. That's pretty much unnoticeable in a real life situation, but credit should be given where it's due.

    The fast focusing speed pairs well with the camera's improved burst rate. It still tops out at 11 fps (even with both continuous autofocus and exposure tracking), but the mid-range burst setting has been raised from 6 to 8 fps.

    The tilting rear LCD comes in handy when shooting at odd angles. (Photo: Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com)

    Another area where the A6300 really shines is video. The 4K video produced by this camera is absolutely stellar—sharper than most 4K footage I've tested to date, even with the included kit lens. Video shooters will also be glad to hear that the A6300 finally includes a mic jack, which was a notable omission on the A6000.

    Speaking of the kit lens, it's probably my biggest gripe with the A6300. I'm not a fan of power-zoom lenses for a number or reasons, but the biggest issue here is that it just isn't that sharp. It will get the job done in most situations, but Sony has plenty of better glass that will give you better results.

    It's clear that the A6300 surpasses the A6000 on almost every front. But is that really a fair comparison? With a body-only price of $1,000 (compared to only $650 for the A6000 at launch), it's simply in another league, and likely appealing to a different buyer.

    But for photographers in this part of the market, this is one of the most technically proficient mirrorless cameras on the market right now, and it's quite a bit cheaper than similar cameras like the Fujifilm X-Pro2 or Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II. Video shooters might be especially tempted to pick up the A6300 for its stellar 4K capabilities.

    Just about the only people who are likely to be disappointed with the A6300 are those hoping that these upgrades would arrive closer to the A6000's original launch price. If you've already got an A6000 and want a better camera, you now have to spend more to get there.

    Price aside, Sony has produced an excellent camera that can compete with the best models in its class. It may not be a direct successor to the A6000, but it takes everything that camera did well and does it even better. What more can you ask for?

    For more in-depth camera reviews, head to Reviewed.com. 

    Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1ShIbaC


    Source: Sequel to most popular mirrorless camera is a step up