Pages

Sunday, 24 April 2016

Do You Really Need a Small Camera for Street Photography?

We are living in an era in which everyone complains about their bulky camera gear and how hard it is to carry it all day. Many photographers are now switching to mirrorless cameras for this reason. But hey, there is another solution for that: You can minimize your lenses and other gear, rather than changing your main camera body. That's what I did. 

First of all, I'm not a supporter of a specific brand or a gear fetishist guy. I started photography with a Nikon film camera, then bought my first DSLR, a Nikon D80. I used the D3 and D300 mostly for shoots. Later on, I switched to Canon (1D Mark III & 5D Mark II), and last year, I bought a Nikon D810 because of its wide dynamic range and higher megapixel count. I buy and use the camera bodies that work best for me. To make a long story short, the brand doesn't matter for me. 

I've been mostly shooting fashion and commercial images in the studio, but recently, I started traveling more, and I decided to carry my camera with me all the time, just like before, when I first started photography. I was passionate, and I just wanted to shoot everything, everywhere. I guess I missed that feeling. Because when your hobby becomes your profession, sometimes, you have to take a break and decide to do whatever you really like for a while. For me, it is street photography, and as we all know, for street photography, every ounce matters.

I will not argue about the weight of the D810 or some other big camera bodies. However, I like using a DSLR, and I don't want to switch to any Sony full-frame mirrorless camera just for this reason (not until Sony produces a battery that lets me shoot 1,000 images per charge). I just don't want to follow the herd. Actually, until last year, I never had concerns about the weight of the equipment I use. But time is the only truth, and we are all getting old. I wanted to get back into street photography, but unfortunately, I didn't feel I had the same energy for carrying all my heavy gear as I did in my early 20s. After years of long day work, including hours of sitting and doing retouching, I started to have back pain for the first time in my life last year. It was a vital signal from my body, so it led me to take it seriously and do something about this weight issue. 

Getting Rid of the Unnecessary Accessories

I've been using battery grips since my first DSLR, but from now on, for outdoor shooting or daily photo walks, I leave them at home. A single attached battery is always enough for these kinds of occasions anyway. Also, some other accessories that I rarely use such as a viewfinder magnifier, LCD hood, etc. now stay in my cabinet as well. I was able to shoot without these items before, so I can shoot without them again, no big deal. Hence, all I wanted was just a small camera bag. 

Switching to Prime Lenses

Most of us own 24-70mm lenses, and we all believe that those are the most flexible lenses for most situations. I used Canon, Sigma, and Tamron 24-70mm lenses on different DSLR bodies, and I must admit that they are really big and heavy lenses. During the time that I owned a Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 DI VC USD, I realized that I usually prevented myself from holding my camera or even taking it out of my bag. So, I sold my Tamron that weighed 845g and bought a Nikkor 28mm f/1.8G in addition to my other primes, the Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G and Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G. In terms of weight and price, 1.8G series prime lenses were the best choices for me. Here is the best part: a 28mm and 85mm lens duo weigh less than the Tamron 24-70 alone, and when they are attached to my D810, the combination doesn't feel heavy. Plus, the Nikkor 28mm f/1.8G is a Nano-coated lens, and with its unique focal length that's different than the usual 35mm focal length, I think it is great for street photography. 

One of the other advantages of using budget primes is that I can carry and use small ND and circular polarizing filters all the time, particularly because both the Nikkor 85mm f/1.8G and Nikkor 28mm f/1.8G have the same filter thread size: 67mm. So, I got the chance to get rid of my square filter adapters, holder, and big filter case as well. With these compact but high quality lenses, I'm happy with my "bulky" but perfect DSLR. 

Well, I handled the weight issue, but what about the myth of the necessity of owning a small camera for street photography? You may think that you should buy a Fuji, Sony, or Olympus compact camera, but as I stated before, I just like shooting with my Nikon DSLR. Some say that you should cover yourself and your camera for street photography, but I disagree with that. We are photographers. If you want to shoot candid street images, you don't have to hide a small black camera under your jacket like agents during the Cold War. No one can blame you because you are holding a big camera in a public place. It is your attitude rather than your gear's size that matters. Streets are full of mobile phone photographers and selfie takers. Many people own DSLR, mirrorless, or compact cameras and use them every day. It's 2016, and people have gotten used to seeing other people with cameras everywhere. Don't get stuck on the essentials of being a street photographer, because there are no essentials! Let's just say there are marketing tricks. You can read everywhere that you need to own a small camera that won't attract your subjects for street photography. Well, if this is your concern, use your mobile phone, and shoot your subject while pretending to be talking on the phone. 

Briefly, I'm happy with less. When I walk around with a single lens and body, I just concentrate on my photography and abilities with my current gear setup. So, what are your thoughts about this? Should street photographers hide themselves and their cameras or interact with their subjects? Should they love and use the gear they own effectively, or save money to buy a Leica? Is weight an issue for you?


Source: Do You Really Need a Small Camera for Street Photography?

Saturday, 23 April 2016

What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next one

So you're in the market for a new camera, possibly your first serious camera, but you can't decide what to plump for. Look no further: in a bid to help connect you with your ideal camera, we look at what factors you need to consider when identifying your own photographic needs, and then break down the different types of camera on offer.

Things to consider

First off, there is no single best camera. There is, however, the best camera for you, and that's going to be based on things such as what subjects you want to shoot, whether you prioritize image quality or portability, if you are willing to learn how to get the most out of a camera, and how much you want to spend.

We'll start off with the factors which are probably going to influence your decision the most: how much you're happy to shell out, and what you'll be willing to carry around. Yes, that top-of-the-range Fujifilm X-Pro 2 camera might look perfect, but if you can't afford it, you need to consider which specifications you are willing to sacrifice to come in on budget.

Equally, there's no point buying a fantastic (but large) camera like the Canon 1D X II only to leave it at home all the time because it's too big and heavy to carry. Also, remember that as you add more, or bigger, lenses to an interchangeable lens system, it will get considerably heavier, and more expensive. We're all too aware of the phenomenon which sees camera kits get inexplicably bigger after late-night eBay sessions.

Your next big consideration should probably be what you want to take photos of. It might sound silly, but you could easily end up spending hundreds of dollars on gear you don't really need, by not giving this sufficient thought. Your subject will often determine what aperture or focal length lenses you need, what focusing systems will give you the most keepers, and how fast you need to be able to take photos.

Think about it this way: if you want to zoom in on distant subjects, there's no point having a camera with a fixed prime lens like the Ricoh GR II or Sony RX1R II. Equally, if you are planning on shooting a fast moving subject, whether professional sports or your kids running around in your garden, you'll need fast focusing which could come in the form of cameras like the Nikon D5, or the Sony A6300.

Image quality will obviously also be something to consider. As we've said before, one of the biggest factors controlling this is the size of image sensor used in a camera. A bigger sensor gives better quality images, especially in lower light. But that's not to say the small sensor of the Samsung Galaxy S7, or the one-inch-type of the Nikon 1 system, can't deliver great images in the right conditions and with the right lenses, so again you need to think about exactly how you will use it.

While the old marker of camera quality was its megapixel count, most cameras will now take images with enough resolution to keep most people happy most of the time. The majority fall in the 14 to 24-megapixel range which is plenty for large prints, and (probably more relevant today) viewing on high resolution screens. If you need more resolution there are cameras like the Canon 5DS or Sony A7R II.

There are also other considerations you wouldn't have had to give a second thought to a couple of years ago. Many cameras can now shoot high quality video at up to 4K and make buying a dedicated camcorder feel redundant for most people. Built-in wireless connectivity also gives users the ability to share photos on Instagram seconds after they were taken, and even control a camera remotely. This means no more setting the timer and trying to run back to the rest of the family in time for a group portrait.

What we are saying is that there are lots of things to consider before choosing a camera. Once you've done this you'll probably have a list of characteristics and features you can't live without, and another list of things you'd ideally like in your new camera.

Smartphone

The chances are you already have a very capable camera sitting in your pocket. Smartphone cameras have improved so much in recent years, gaining features including optical image stabilization and wide aperture lenses, that they are often now better than many compact point-and-shoots from a couple of years ago.

Smartphone cameras are great for users who want to travel light and are unwilling to carry a dedicated camera. They are perfect for snapping everyday photos, and sharing instantly. While in the right hands they are capable of turning out amazing images, you are still going to get better quality images from a dedicated camera, especially in lower light conditions.

The best thing about smartphone cameras is how portable they are and the fact you've probably got one with you when you see something you want to photograph. The ability to edit your images on them and share them instantly is also a massive benefit for the social media generation. However most only feature a fixed focal length lens, meaning you are left zooming with your feet (the digital zooming you do on your phone is basically pre-shot cropping).

Compact

Compact cameras come in a number of shapes and sizes including the classic point-and-shoot, enthusiast-friendly models, bridge cameras with massive zooms, and large-sensored cameras with a prime lens. What they have in common is permanently attached lenses, which means you don't get to swap the glass to suit your subject. That said, a handful of compacts like the Fujifilm X100T or Ricoh GR II do have the option of wide-angle or telephoto convertor lens add-ons.

This sort of camera is often good for users who prioritize portability and simplicity, and you don't have to make the same sacrifice in image quality you would have just a few years ago. Pocketable compacts like the Panasonic ZS100 or Sony RX100 IV now pack larger sensors and fast zoom lenses making them good everyday or travel cameras. Meanwhile devices like the Sony RX1R II can genuinely offer the same image quality as much bigger cameras, for those willing to make do with a fixed prime lenses.

Unlike traditional point-and-shoot cameras which have been all but made redundant by smartphones, the new breed of quality compacts still have a lot to offer over your iPhone 6S or Huawei P9. This increasingly includes big sensors, fast autofocus, and physical access to manual controls. Meanwhile built-in Wi-Fi means images can be shared almost as fast as those shot with a smartphone. If you can find space for a compact in your bag or jacket, you will end up with better quality images than simply whipping out your phone. However, what compacts can't do is offer the combination of versatility and quality of interchangeable lens cameras.

Action-cam / Tough

Sometimes you need a camera which can survive in adverse conditions, or take the odd knock. Action and tough cameras are designed to take a bashing. While action cameras are often used to shoot videos of extreme exploits, tough cameras are more traditional compact cameras which can still cope with being submerged in water or dropped on the floor.

Action cameras are best suited for people who want to record video footage of their activities, though can also be use to snap still images. Like the ubiquitous GoPro offerings, they tend to feature very wide-angle lenses which give an immersive perspective. As such, they are not suited to everyday photography. Editing footage can also be labor intensive, though newer cameras like the TomTom Bandit now make editing easier.

Tough cameras can offer equivalent ruggedness, but are designed for more traditional photography. Cameras like the Olympus TG-4 or Ricoh WG-4 GPS, are essentially compact cameras in protective armor. With the exception of the odd camera like the (very expensive) Leica X-U, action and tough camera are focused on this ruggedness at the cost of image quality, so unless your camera is going to take a bashing, you probably don't need one.

Mirrorless

Unlike the cameras we've looked at so far, mirrorless cameras are interchangeable lens cameras. This means lenses can be swapped allowing you to select the best one for your subjects. This instantly makes mirrorless cameras (at least potentially) much more versatile than a camera with a fixed lens. They also tend to have much more capable performance than most fixed lens cameras.

The main difference between mirrorless cameras and the DSLRs we'll come to next, is that mirrorless cameras, as the name suggests, lack the mirror which features in traditional DSLRs. This allows mirrorless cameras to be significantly smaller. Some, like the Canon EOS M3, are not much bigger than a compact, while others like the Leica SL are as big as some DSLRs. However, this also means these cameras lack the optical viewfinder of DSLRs. That said, the electronic viewfinders on some mirrorless cameras (not all have one) are much better than they were a few years ago.

The performance of mirrorless cameras ranges from that which will keep beginners happy, to that demanded by professionals. Sensor size and image quality also varies, with most mirrorless cameras using sensors from the one-inch-types used in the Nikon 1 series, to the full frame sensors of the Sony A7 line. As such there's a mirrorless camera out there for the needs of anyone whether you want pocketable or ultimate quality.

Mirrorless cameras are almost certainly the future of photography and have many benefits over DSLRs, such as their size (and that of accompanying lenses) and generally better video capabilities, they also tend to have more mod cons such as sensor shift image stabilization, and built-in wireless capabilities. However, there are still some drawbacks to them. These include the more limited battery life, and that there are generally not as many compatible lenses for them.

DSLR

DSLRs look like the sort of camera you have probably seen enthusiast and professional photographers using for decades. They are generally black and quite bulky, and are indeed the digital offspring of the SLR cameras you might remember from the film days.

Because they're based on previous generations of camera, DSLRs are often compatible with a great number of lenses and use either APS-C or full frame image sensors. This means they offer an image quality only equaled by compact or mirrorless cameras with the same size sensor. Auto-focus and general photography performance is also normally up there – either equaling or bettering mirrorless cameras at the same price point.

While DSLRs might be beginning to feel dated, there are still a number of reasons they might be right for you. Firstly, if you already have a selection of compatible lenses, they are going to be more affordable than buying into new systems. DSLRs can also offer a compelling level of performance and quality given their cost.

However, the film-based heritage of DSLRs also means they have a few disadvantages over mirrorless cameras. The big one is size, the use of a mirror instantly makes DSLRs significantly larger. It also limits burst shooting speeds (with the mirror generally moving between shots) and means video functions do not feel as integrated.

Other

While the aforementioned camera types will make up the majority of new camera purchases, there are plenty of other more specialist devices out there. These include new 360 degree cameras like the Ricoh Theta S and the upcoming Nikon KeyMission 360 as well as film cameras, and instant cameras like the Impossible Project I-1 and Fujifilm Instax offerings. There are also smartphone add-on cameras like the DxO One, and family-friendly shooters like the Nikon S33. Given the varied but more specialist nature of this category, the sort of people who are buying these cameras generally already know what they can do, along with their relative positives and negatives.

What will you opt for?

Hopefully this guide has given you an idea about what type of camera will suit your needs best. You may have come to the conclusion that you're best off with a smartphone, or maybe that a fixed prime lens compact camera is right for you.

If you are opting for an interchangeable lens camera to achieve your photographic ambitions, you'll not only have to decide between mirrorless and DSLR, but also which brand. This is important because lenses can't generally be used across different brands easily. Brands use specific lens mounts, so if you buy into one system, you'll have an investment in it, and will probably be less inclined to switch to something else in the future.

While we've tried to highlight a few of our favorite cameras in each category as we've gone along, there are (as we've said once or twice) loads more vying for your attention. Whatever camera you end up opting for, we hope you enjoy getting out there and using it.


Source: What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next one

Friday, 22 April 2016

What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next camera

So you're in the market for a new camera, possibly your first serious camera, but you can't decide what to plump for. Look no further: in a bid to help connect you with your ideal camera, we look at what factors you need to consider when identifying your own photographic needs, and then break down the different types of camera on offer.

Things to consider

First off, there is no single best camera. There is, however, the best camera for you, and that's going to be based on things such as what subjects you want to shoot, whether you prioritize image quality or portability, if you are willing to learn how to get the most out of a camera, and how much you want to spend.

We'll start off with the factors which are probably going to influence your decision the most: how much you're happy to shell out, and what you'll be willing to carry around. Yes, that top-of-the-range Fujifilm X-Pro 2 camera might look perfect, but if you can't afford it, you need to consider which specifications you are willing to sacrifice to come in on budget.

Equally, there's no point buying a fantastic (but large) camera like the Canon 1D X II only to leave it at home all the time because it's too big and heavy to carry. Also, remember that as you add more, or bigger, lenses to an interchangeable lens system, it will get considerably heavier, and more expensive. We're all too aware of the phenomenon which sees camera kits get inexplicably bigger after late-night eBay sessions.

Your next big consideration should probably be what you want to take photos of. It might sound silly, but you could easily end up spending hundreds of dollars on gear you don't really need, by not giving this sufficient thought. Your subject will often determine what aperture or focal length lenses you need, what focusing systems will give you the most keepers, and how fast you need to be able to take photos.

Think about it this way: if you want to zoom in on distant subjects, there's no point having a camera with a fixed prime lens like the Ricoh GR II or Sony RX1R II. Equally, if you are planning on shooting a fast moving subject, whether professional sports or your kids running around in your garden, you'll need fast focusing which could come in the form of cameras like the Nikon D5, or the Sony A6300.

Image quality will obviously also be something to consider. As we've said before, one of the biggest factors controlling this is the size of image sensor used in a camera. A bigger sensor gives better quality images, especially in lower light. But that's not to say the small sensor of the Samsung Galaxy S7, or the one-inch-type of the Nikon 1 system, can't deliver great images in the right conditions and with the right lenses, so again you need to think about exactly how you will use it.

While the old marker of camera quality was its megapixel count, most cameras will now take images with enough resolution to keep most people happy most of the time. The majority fall in the 14 to 24-megapixel range which is plenty for large prints, and (probably more relevant today) viewing on high resolution screens. If you need more resolution there are cameras like the Canon 5DS or Sony A7R II.

There are also other considerations you wouldn't have had to give a second thought to a couple of years ago. Many cameras can now shoot high quality video at up to 4K and make buying a dedicated camcorder feel redundant for most people. Built-in wireless connectivity also gives users the ability to share photos on Instagram seconds after they were taken, and even control a camera remotely. This means no more setting the timer and trying to run back to the rest of the family in time for a group portrait.

What we are saying is that there are lots of things to consider before choosing a camera. Once you've done this you'll probably have a list of characteristics and features you can't live without, and another list of things you'd ideally like in your new camera.

Smartphone

The chances are you already have a very capable camera sitting in your pocket. Smartphone cameras have improved so much in recent years, gaining features including optical image stabilization and wide aperture lenses, that they are often now better than many compact point-and-shoots from a couple of years ago.

Smartphone cameras are great for users who want to travel light and are unwilling to carry a dedicated camera. They are perfect for snapping everyday photos, and sharing instantly. While in the right hands they are capable of turning out amazing images, you are still going to get better quality images from a dedicated camera, especially in lower light conditions.

The best thing about smartphone cameras is how portable they are and the fact you've probably got one with you when you see something you want to photograph. The ability to edit your images on them and share them instantly is also a massive benefit for the social media generation. However most only feature a fixed focal length lens, meaning you are left zooming with your feet (the digital zooming you do on your phone is basically pre-shot cropping).

Compact

Compact cameras come in a number of shapes and sizes including the classic point-and-shoot, enthusiast-friendly models, bridge cameras with massive zooms, and large-sensored cameras with a prime lens. What they have in common is permanently attached lenses, which means you don't get to swap the glass to suit your subject. That said, a handful of compacts like the Fujifilm X100T or Ricoh GR II do have the option of wide-angle or telephoto convertor lens add-ons.

This sort of camera is often good for users who prioritize portability and simplicity, and you don't have to make the same sacrifice in image quality you would have just a few years ago. Pocketable compacts like the Panasonic ZS100 or Sony RX100 IV now pack larger sensors and fast zoom lenses making them good everyday or travel cameras. Meanwhile devices like the Sony RX1R II can genuinely offer the same image quality as much bigger cameras, for those willing to make do with a fixed prime lenses.

Unlike traditional point-and-shoot cameras which have been all but made redundant by smartphones, the new breed of quality compacts still have a lot to offer over your iPhone 6S or Huawei P9. This increasingly includes big sensors, fast autofocus, and physical access to manual controls. Meanwhile built-in Wi-Fi means images can be shared almost as fast as those shot with a smartphone. If you can find space for a compact in your bag or jacket, you will end up with better quality images than simply whipping out your phone. However, what compacts can't do is offer the combination of versatility and quality of interchangeable lens cameras.

Action-cam / Tough

Sometimes you need a camera which can survive in adverse conditions, or take the odd knock. Action and tough cameras are designed to take a bashing. While action cameras are often used to shoot videos of extreme exploits, tough cameras are more traditional compact cameras which can still cope with being submerged in water or dropped on the floor.

Action cameras are best suited for people who want to record video footage of their activities, though can also be use to snap still images. Like the ubiquitous GoPro offerings, they tend to feature very wide-angle lenses which give an immersive perspective. As such, they are not suited to everyday photography. Editing footage can also be labor intensive, though newer cameras like the TomTom Bandit now make editing easier.

Tough cameras can offer equivalent ruggedness, but are designed for more traditional photography. Cameras like the Olympus TG-4 or Ricoh WG-4 GPS, are essentially compact cameras in protective armor. With the exception of the odd camera like the (very expensive) Leica X-U, action and tough camera are focused on this ruggedness at the cost of image quality, so unless your camera is going to take a bashing, you probably don't need one.

Mirrorless

Unlike the cameras we've looked at so far, mirrorless cameras are interchangeable lens cameras. This means lenses can be swapped allowing you to select the best one for your subjects. This instantly makes mirrorless cameras (at least potentially) much more versatile than a camera with a fixed lens. They also tend to have much more capable performance than most fixed lens cameras.

The main difference between mirrorless cameras and the DSLRs we'll come to next, is that mirrorless cameras, as the name suggests, lack the mirror which features in traditional DSLRs. This allows mirrorless cameras to be significantly smaller. Some, like the Canon EOS M3, are not much bigger than a compact, while others like the Leica SL are as big as some DSLRs. However, this also means these cameras lack the optical viewfinder of DSLRs. That said, the electronic viewfinders on some mirrorless cameras (not all have one) are much better than they were a few years ago.

The performance of mirrorless cameras ranges from that which will keep beginners happy, to that demanded by professionals. Sensor size and image quality also varies, with most mirrorless cameras using sensors from the one-inch-types used in the Nikon 1 series, to the full frame sensors of the Sony A7 line. As such there's a mirrorless camera out there for the needs of anyone whether you want pocketable or ultimate quality.

Mirrorless cameras are almost certainly the future of photography and have many benefits over DSLRs, such as their size (and that of accompanying lenses) and generally better video capabilities, they also tend to have more mod cons such as sensor shift image stabilization, and built-in wireless capabilities. However, there are still some drawbacks to them. These include the more limited battery life, and that there are generally not as many compatible lenses for them.

DSLR

DSLRs look like the sort of camera you have probably seen enthusiast and professional photographers using for decades. They are generally black and quite bulky, and are indeed the digital offspring of the SLR cameras you might remember from the film days.

Because they're based on previous generations of camera, DSLRs are often compatible with a great number of lenses and use either APS-C or full frame image sensors. This means they offer an image quality only equaled by compact or mirrorless cameras with the same size sensor. Auto-focus and general photography performance is also normally up there – either equaling or bettering mirrorless cameras at the same price point.

While DSLRs might be beginning to feel dated, there are still a number of reasons they might be right for you. Firstly, if you already have a selection of compatible lenses, they are going to be more affordable than buying into new systems. DSLRs can also offer a compelling level of performance and quality given their cost.

However, the film-based heritage of DSLRs also means they have a few disadvantages over mirrorless cameras. The big one is size, the use of a mirror instantly makes DSLRs significantly larger. It also limits burst shooting speeds (with the mirror generally moving between shots) and means video functions do not feel as integrated.

Other

While the aforementioned camera types will make up the majority of new camera purchases, there are plenty of other more specialist devices out there. These include new 360 degree cameras like the Ricoh Theta S and the upcoming Nikon KeyMission 360 as well as film cameras, and instant cameras like the Impossible Project I-1 and Fujifilm Instax offerings. There are also smartphone add-on cameras like the DxO One, and family-friendly shooters like the Nikon S33. Given the varied but more specialist nature of this category, the sort of people who are buying these cameras generally already know what they can do, along with their relative positives and negatives.

What will you opt for?

Hopefully this guide has given you an idea about what type of camera will suit your needs best. You may have come to the conclusion that you're best off with a smartphone, or maybe that a fixed prime lens compact camera is right for you.

If you are opting for an interchangeable lens camera to achieve your photographic ambitions, you'll not only have to decide between mirrorless and DSLR, but also which brand. This is important because lenses can't generally be used across different brands easily. Brands use specific lens mounts, so if you buy into one system, you'll have an investment in it, and will probably be less inclined to switch to something else in the future.

While we've tried to highlight a few of our favorite cameras in each category as we've gone along, there are (as we've said once or twice) loads more vying for your attention. Whatever camera you end up opting for, we hope you enjoy getting out there and using it.


Source: What type of camera do I need? A guide to buying your next camera

Wednesday, 20 April 2016

Sony A6300: The Mirrorless Wonder is Now in India

By SiliconIndia   |   Tuesday, 19 April 2016, 22:03 Hrs

BENGALURU: Back in February, Sony launched a new camera in US; sending photographers all over the world into a meltdown and the device has finally arrived in India. It's the Sony Alpha 6300. Hailed as the successor to the A6000 model, the most popular mirrorless camera ever, the A6300 promises to be in the same line as another mirrorless wonder from Sony, perhaps even better. What's more, the camera is priced aggressively at Rs. 74,990, which includes a 16-50 mm lens.

According to Sony, the A6300 has the world's fastest autofocus (AF) system among APS-C interchangeable cameras at 0.05 seconds. The AF system in the device is similar to the one found in the more advanced A7R II and A7 II cameras, with an astonishing 425 phase detection points. The device features the same 4D AF system seen in the A6000, but more refined and undeniably faster. At the core, the camera has an all new 24.2 megapixels APS-C Exmor CMOS sensor coupled with a BIONZ X image processing engine.

Being a tech company, Sony's rise to the top of the camera market has been an amazing achievement. One reason for Sony's growth, as experts point out, is its ability to combine superior still photography along with high quality video shooting capabilities, taking it way ahead of its competition.   The A6300 is another camera that supports this statement as it produces sharp 4K videos at a bit rate of 100 Mbps with additional features like super-slow motion 1080p video at 120fps.

Built on a full magnesium alloy body, Sony claims the A6300 is resistant to dust and moisture. It has Wi-Fi and NFC compatibility for wireless data transfer and is fully functional with Sony's PlayMemories Mobile application, which is available for Android and iOS platforms. On the downside, the device does not feature touch screen that can be cumbersome for amateur photographers, as it takes time to settle with Sony's menu system. But a mirrorless wonder at Rs. 75,000; it's a bargain for sure.

Read Also: 5 Tablets Ready to Takeover Laptops in the FutureHuawei Launches New VR Headset with 360-degree Sound


Source: Sony A6300: The Mirrorless Wonder is Now in India

Tuesday, 19 April 2016

Sony A6300 mirrorless 4K camera arrives for Rs 74990

The Sony A6300 has finally made its way to India, a few months after the camera made its global debut.

Sony a6300 comes with support for full live-view continuous shooting on the Tru-Finder or via LCD screen at up to 8 fps. The camera can record high resolution 4K video with full pixel readout and no pixel binning in the popular Super 35mm format for up to 29 minutes. Its title feature is the updated 4D Focus system, where the company claims the camera can lock focus on a subject in as little as 50 milliseconds. This combined with the high-density tracking AF technology helps it to quickly follow moving objects in action and perform almost twice as fast as its predecessor. The Sony a6300 features a 24.2MP APS-C Exmor CMOS image sensor with ISO sensitivity ranging between 100 - 51200. The camera will then adjust them according to the subject's motion.

Sony is also touting the ruggedness of the camera.

The sensor features a wide dynamic range-in 14 stops of exposur e-enabling a greater color gamut and brightness depth in images, along with increased latitude during post processing.

If you are looking to create some quality video content for your latest 4K TV, the a6300's got your back.

The main center of attention when it comes to the mirrorless Sony A6300 is its lightning-quick autofocus abilities thanks to an all-new 4D Focus system. The cost includes the 16-50mm lens.

The α6300 camera is equipped with a high contrast, high-resolution XGA OLED Tru-Finder with approximately 2.4 million dots that offers exceptional corner-to-corner visibility.

This camera has magnesium alloy design. On the body are nine customizable buttons that can be assigned from a mix of 64 different functions, enabling the camera to be configured for individual shooting styles.

It is also Wi-Fi and NFC compatible and fully functional with Sony's PlayMemories Mobile application available for Android and iOS platforms, as well as Sony's growin g range of PlayMemories Camera Apps, which add a variety of creative capabilities to the camera. Nothing new here, but it supports QR code pairing for non-NFC devices, similar to how Olympus cameras pair with phones and tablets.

Houston recovering from yet another deadly floodAnother north Houston resident posted video of residents leaving their flooded homes in a canoe as the rain continued to fall. Officials say at least four people were found dead in their vehicles during extreme flooding across the Houston area Monday .


Source: Sony A6300 mirrorless 4K camera arrives for Rs 74990

Monday, 18 April 2016

Canon M3 review: Mirrorless camera for masses

Canon is big on DSLR cameras. And on the compact point-and-shooters. But probably because of its strong position in these two segments, the company hasn't tried very hard in mirrorless market. It has been slow to react to the mirrorless trend. However, the pressure from companies like Sony and Fuji is now pushing Canon.

The company's new Canon M3 camera in India is its attempt to show that it can also make a good mirrorless camera. Canon surely has the brand image to make any camera a success in the market. With the M3, it is also throwing in the mix a fairly aggressive price. The Canon M3 has been priced at Rs 49,995 along with the kit-lens of 18-55mm.

This is a good deal for a mirrorless camera like the M3. Or at least it seems on the paper. So can the M3 be your next camera?

Design, build quality and controls

After struggling in the wilderness for some time, the mirrorless cameras are finally finding the right design. The M3 definitely gets it right. It is compact enough to be carelessly tossed inside a bag and yet is hefty enough to feel sizeable in hands. The whole camera body is made of metal, so it feels very sturdy and well-built. But at the right side of the camera, there is a layer of thick rubber-like material that covers the whole grip-area. The grip is not very deep but for a mirrorless camera it is chunky and helps a shooter hold the camera securely while clicking images.

It is easy to carry the M3 in a bag and easier still to use it when you are in a tight spot where a DSLR camera would be a burden

In fact, this grip is one area where it is easy to see Canon utilise its expertise in camera making to the fullest. The rounded edge and the cuts created in the grip makes the M3 a joy to hold, relative to other mirrorless cameras.  

On top of the camera there are two dials. While the bigger dial allows a user to select from different shooting modes, the smaller one provides direct control to exposure compensation, which is a welcome addition. If you are coming from a point-and-shoot camera, you will find the M3 easy enough to use. Just keep it on the auto, at least in the beginning, and let it do its magic. If you are coming from a DSLR, you will find the controls somewhat lacking. But that is normal. The good news with the M3 is that most of its buttons are configurable. This means, spend a week or two with it, and you will be able to set it up the way you like it.

Also Read: Canon Powershot G9X review: Punching above its weight

It also helps that the screen in the camera is touch-sensitive. You won't realise how big of a deal this is until you use one. The focusing and composing images are just all that more easier with a touchscreen camera.

Overall, we find the M3 one of the better designed mirrorless cameras in the market. The build quality is fantastic, the options to customise the controls are plenty and the touchscreen makes it handier to operate.

With a lens like 18-55mm attached to it, the M3 makes for a fairly compact camera. No, it won't fit in your jeans pocket or for that matter even the jacket pocket. But it is easy to carry the M3 in a bag and easier still to use it when you are in a tight spot where DSLR camera would be a burden.

Performance The big deal with the M3 is that it packs in the photography hardware that is very similar to what you get in a crop-sized or in other words APS-C Canon camera like Canon 750D. It has a 24-megapixel image sensor and a fully-functional 49-point focus system. And it works like a camera that is true to its hardware.

Although, nowadays in cameras there are many moving parts and the performance is rarely absolute good or bad. Overall, the M3 performance is a mixed bag. When it comes to actual image quality, the camera excels. The M3 is the kind of camera that will be used mostly on auto made, and that is also where it is strongest. In most lighting conditions, it nails the white balance, and the JPEG images that come out of it have excellent colours. The metering, however, tends to err on the side of underexposure. Although once you get the hang of the camera and understand how it sees the scenes, you can easily fix this by using the handy exposure compensation dial.

For its class, the overall focus speed of the M3 is on the slower side. Of course, it is faster than smaller cameras and is capable of freezing hyperactive pets into a frame. But DSLR cameras in this price range as well as cameras like the Sony A6000 are faster than the M3, especially in low light, at acquiring focus and tracking subjects.

Also Read: Using Sony A6000: Can a mirrorless camera make you dump bulky DSLR?

Cameras nowadays have become very good at creating images. And whether you pick a Nikon or a Canon camera, you will be able to create beautiful images. Although, learning to creating such images with the M3 takes slightly longer. Reason? It falls a little short on the dynamic range part. This also makes the job of the photographer a bit more trickier. You have to get exposure absolutely right because unlike say Sony A6000, the M3 doesn't give all that much leeway to lift shadows in post-processing.

The M3 can shoot RAW images although most of the time the JPEGs are not only good enough but also more convenient.

Also Read: Shooting wildlife with mirrorless camera? It's complicated

One bit where the M3 truly excels is at handling noise. It churns out images that are extremely clean. It supports ISO of as high as 12800. Even in alarmingly low light, the camera makes sure that the noise is at minimum, which means most of the time you get clean images with contrasty colours.

But we said that the M3 performance is a mixed bag. Right? The area where it falters is its battery life. Once charged 100 per cent, the battery in M3 lasts around 180 to 200 shots, which is on the lower side.

Should you buy it

The Canon M3 is a very good camera and its price of Rs 49,995 is aggressive. It all depends on what you are looking to do from your camera. If you want a mirrorless camera, the M3 should be definitely on your radar. But at the same time, Sony A6000 sells for a similar price and is overall a better camera than the M3.

This whole M3 vs A6000 is a rather interesting fight. The Sony's camera has a better image sensor and is overall a better performer. But the lens that Sony bundles with the A6000 is pathetic. The M3, on the other hand, has a better design and feels better in hands. The 18-55mm lens bundled with it is not some real hot shot like Canon's L lenses, but then it is better than what Sony gives. Finally, there is the ecosystem. Canon, because of its apathetic attitude towards mirrorless camera, for now has just a handful of lenses that support M3 lens mount. Sony offers more lenses, including premium lenses, for A6000.

To make it simple for you, let's summarise this. If you are spending Rs 50,000 on your mirrorless camera and don't intend to buy any other lens, the M3 is the camera you can buy. It is also easy to use and most of the time churns out nice images without much fuss. But if you intend to get into the photography with serious aspirations and want to do so with a mirrorless camera, the A6000 is a better deal. Sony offers a shooter that is more versatile and capable. 

  • Good stuff
  • Very good image quality
  • Good ISO performance
  • Aggressive price
  • Superb design
  • Bad stuff
  • Not enough lenses
  • Sensor weak on DR
  • Average battery life
  • Sluggish performance
  • For more news from India Today, follow us on Twitter @indiatoday and on Facebook at facebook.com/IndiaTodayFor news and videos in Hindi, go to AajTak.in.ताज़ातरीन ख़बरों और वीडियो के लिए आजतक.इन पर आएं.


    Source: Canon M3 review: Mirrorless camera for masses

    Saturday, 16 April 2016

    Sequel to most popular mirrorless camera is a step up

    Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com 9:03 a.m. EDT April 16, 2016

    Sony's A6300: Newer. Better. Faster. Stronger.(Photo: Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com)

    Sony has finally revealed the long-awaited follow-up to its mega-popular A6000 mirrorless camera, the new Sony Alpha A6300 (MSRP $999 body-only). The A6000 scored points with users thanks to its combination of small size, big performance, and affordable price. While Sony has billed the A6300 as the successor to the A6000, we think it's more like a big brother–largely due to the improved performance and, subsequently, the inflated price.

    Even with the price increase, the A6300 doesn't shortchange users on performance, as it's simply one of the best mirrorless cameras we've tested to date. But as a result it's competing with much more expensive cameras than the A6000 ever did. While it might not replicate exactly what made the A6000 great, it's so good it'll likely pave its own road to success.

    Compared to some of its peers, the A6300 is rather simple in terms of design—I suppose my biggest complaint about it is that it simply lacks character. However, Sony did a great job in almost every other respect. That includes the beautiful 2.4 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF), which comes in handy on bright, sunny days.

    The A6300 is not a large camera, so portability is certainly a pro. (Photo: Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com)

    The A6300 performs well in an impressive range of lighting conditions thanks to sensitivity that goes up to ISO 51,200. That said, images are a bit noisy if you're not using any noise reduction settings, so I recommend setting it to "low" if you plan on shooting above ISO 1,600.

    Sony says that it has once again set the bar for autofocusing speed, claiming that the A6300 takes just 0.05 seconds to focus. That's pretty much unnoticeable in a real life situation, but credit should be given where it's due.

    The fast focusing speed pairs well with the camera's improved burst rate. It still tops out at 11 fps (even with both continuous autofocus and exposure tracking), but the mid-range burst setting has been raised from 6 to 8 fps.

    The tilting rear LCD comes in handy when shooting at odd angles. (Photo: Kyle Looney, Reviewed.com)

    Another area where the A6300 really shines is video. The 4K video produced by this camera is absolutely stellar—sharper than most 4K footage I've tested to date, even with the included kit lens. Video shooters will also be glad to hear that the A6300 finally includes a mic jack, which was a notable omission on the A6000.

    Speaking of the kit lens, it's probably my biggest gripe with the A6300. I'm not a fan of power-zoom lenses for a number or reasons, but the biggest issue here is that it just isn't that sharp. It will get the job done in most situations, but Sony has plenty of better glass that will give you better results.

    It's clear that the A6300 surpasses the A6000 on almost every front. But is that really a fair comparison? With a body-only price of $1,000 (compared to only $650 for the A6000 at launch), it's simply in another league, and likely appealing to a different buyer.

    But for photographers in this part of the market, this is one of the most technically proficient mirrorless cameras on the market right now, and it's quite a bit cheaper than similar cameras like the Fujifilm X-Pro2 or Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II. Video shooters might be especially tempted to pick up the A6300 for its stellar 4K capabilities.

    Just about the only people who are likely to be disappointed with the A6300 are those hoping that these upgrades would arrive closer to the A6000's original launch price. If you've already got an A6000 and want a better camera, you now have to spend more to get there.

    Price aside, Sony has produced an excellent camera that can compete with the best models in its class. It may not be a direct successor to the A6000, but it takes everything that camera did well and does it even better. What more can you ask for?

    For more in-depth camera reviews, head to Reviewed.com. 

    Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1ShIbaC


    Source: Sequel to most popular mirrorless camera is a step up